Nobel Prize in Literature Predictions Are Almost Always...

The New Republic

You have read:

0 / 8

free articles in the past 30 days.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

sign up for unlimited access for just $34.97Sign me up

NOBEL PRIZE OCTOBER 8, 2013

Nobel Prize in Literature Predictions Are Almost Always Wrong

As several people have pointed out, the folks who concoct Nobel Prize for Literature odds most likely haven't done much reading. According to the Boston Globe, the bookies at Ladbrokes, a British gaming company, apply numerical value to factors such as industry chatter, an author's nationality, and historical precedent rather than the relative merits of each book. This year, the odds favor Haruki Murakami, followed by Joyce Carol Oates. But despite the efforts to tease out the politics behind the Nobel Committee's final choice, bookie predictions tend to be fairly inaccurate. Here's a quick run-down of just how infrequently Ladbrokes's front-runner has lined up with the actual winner:

 
2012
Prediction: Haruki Murakami
Winner: Mo Yan
 
2011
Prediction: Adonis
Winner: Tomas Transtomer
 
2010
Prediction: Tomas Transtomer
Winner: Mario Vargas Llosa
 
2009
Prediction: Amos Oz
Winner: Herta Muller
 
2008
Prediction: Claudio Magris, Adonis
Winner: Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio
 
2007
Prediction: Philip Roth
Winner: Dorris Lessing
 
2006
Prediction: Orhan Pamuk
Winner: Orhan Pamuk
 
2005
Prediction: Adonis
Winner: Harold Pinter
 
2004
Prediction: Adonis
Winner: Elfriede Jelinek
 

share this article on facebook or twitter

posted in: books, culture, the plank

print this article

PHOTO BY Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty Images
Back to Top

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK