POLITICS JUNE 25, 2008
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

It's May 23, 2008, and eleven presidential candidates are crowding the dais on a tiny stage in the Columbine Meeting Room. We're in the bowels of a Sheraton in downtown Denver, at the Libertarian National Convention some 70 miles from the party's birthplace in Colorado Springs. Many delegates expect that Colorado is about to become the location of the party's demise as well—in, oh, about 48 hours.
The would-be culprit, the twelfth candidate, is absent. He is the former representative Bob Barr, Republican of Georgia (1995-2003), who entered the race less than two weeks before the convention and the party less than two years prior, and who has skipped tonight's informal debate to host a meet-and- greet with his supporters. A central-casting Southern pol with a neat mustache and a terrifying caffeine habit (his drink of choice is a latte with five espresso shots), Barr arrives lugging some heavy baggage. In the 1990s, he was the public face of the Republican drive to impeach Bill Clinton—before the Lewinsky scandal broke. He introduced the Defense of Marriage Act and later signed off on the Patriot Act, two of the least beloved pieces of recent legislation among Libertarians. His PAC, the Bob Barr Leadership Fund, raised $4.3 million for Republican campaigns between 2003 and 2008—some of it while Bob was already an ostensible Libertarian. More than $4 million of that money went toward further fund-raising and "administrative" costs—including a salary for Barr's son, Derek. He says he now regrets much of this resumé. Some take him at his word. "Bob saw the light," says Aleq Boyle of Chickamauga, Georgia, a Barr lieutenant and a former Republican himself. (Libertarians use this terminology quite a bit--revelation, conversion, epiphany.) The rest suspect a Republican Trojan horse.
I call Barr aide Audrey Mullen and ask why Barr skipped the debate. "Bob wants to discuss real issues with real candidates," she says. Cold as the Rockies, but one can see her point. The eleven onstage look more like community- theater auditionees than presidential applicants. In the audience, there is a man in a Guy Fawkes mask; Starchild, a California masseur dressed as a pirate; and the Sumerian Libertarian, a white-mohawked older gentleman with saucer-size hoops in grotesquely distended earlobes and several bonelike objects piercing his septum.
As Brian Doherty writes in his definitive 741-page tome, Radicals for Capitalism, being a libertarian means "sailing on seas of opposition and indifference with an often bizarre and difficult bunch of shipmates." The movement's embrace of personal freedom is wide enough to welcome a Wall Street wing concerned mostly with deregulation; a sci-fi contingent dreaming of space colonies and immortality; a sizable anarchist (or "minarchist") faction preaching dissolution of almost all federal agencies; and, in the last few years, a steady, surly influx of 9/11 "truthers."
All and more of these groups are on proud display in Denver. Vendor booths trumpet Native American mysticism, the "inflation-proof Liberty Dollar," and, perhaps inevitably, Shotgun Willie's, a local strip club. One group is raffling off a motorcycle, with a disclaimer of opposition to helmet laws ("Those who ride should decide"). Another is showing The Matrix on mute, with custom subtitles. "Purity? You mean Rothbardianism?" says Keanu Reeves. Come to think of it, it's not too far from the film's original dialogue.
Barr's gamble is that enough Libertarians are fed up with this sideshow pageantry and would like some votes for a change. Since the party's foundation in 1971, the apogee of its electoral success remains 1980, when Ed Clark ran in all 50 states and captured close to a million votes. Eight years later, Ron Paul took less than half that. Paul's current run, of course, is a national phenomenon—except one unfolding outside the Libertarians' reach, a fact that imbues the convention with strange, twitchy pathos. Almost all of the delegates are Paul fans, but, because their hero is running as a GOP candidate (switching back would cost Paul his House seniority), Libertarians, come November, will have to choose between their own party and a write-in for Paul. His absence has created a gaping vacancy, and every single candidate here is trying to fill the vacuum.
With Barr otherwise engaged, the biggest name on the debate dais is former Alaska senator Mike Gravel. Another neophyte, he joined the party nearly three months ago after bowing out of a run for the Democratic nomination. Gravel used his time in the national spotlight to tape ornery cable appearances and inscrutable YouTube promos, all of which are now running on a loop at his booth (including a seasonal one that informs us, in song, that he's "running for president, and he's filled with Christmas cheer"). Gravel is candid about his motives and expectations. He's mostly mad at the Democrats—who, he says, pushed him out of the race for criticizing the U.S. stance on Iran—and would enjoy a platform from which to dish out some mild payback. His floor team includes Neal, a long-haired Wiccan who has a beef with Barr "because he tried to stop Wiccans from worshiping in the military" and granddaughter Renee, 20 years old and in full Goth regalia featuring a spiky dog collar. "He's the kind of grandpa you see on TV," she says of Gravel, tongue stud flickering between her teeth. "The one who comes to visit for Christmas, opens the presents. You know?" (I do, in fact--I've seen the video.) "This will either end my career, or give me a boost for the next six months," Gravel tells me. "I'll take either. "
Most of the assembled purists save their loudest cheers for "Dr. Mary" Ruwart, a party veteran with a soft, hypnotic voice that doesn't break its motherly cadence even when she explains how the right to carry concealed weapons could have prevented September 11. (She's also on the record suggesting that children should have a right to consent to sex with adults.) Her mostly male fans have come equipped with posters that say "Mary" inside a red heart. Another old-school favorite is Steve Kubby, a cancer-battling marijuana activist who drives a 1984 Mercedes that runs on cooking oil. The Mary-Kubby people are fast congealing into an anti-Barr alliance. From my informal survey of signs and pins and hats and paddles and T-shirts, Mary has the ears of about 25 percent of the delegates and Kubby another 20 percent: enough to make Barr nervous. Ruwart suggests that she would pick up Hillary Clinton supporters, who "can't wait to vote for a woman," and the heart-Mary signs fly up.
A few doomed dabblers march across the stage, serving up a glimpse into the party's various now-endangered constituencies. Christine Smith, a New Age-y redhead with a musical twang, says things like "Ah see freedom in the ahhs of wild creatures." Alden Link is an older gentleman who talks exactly like Truman Capote, except about the Second Amendment.
And then something electrifying happens. A man from Las Vegas named Wayne Allyn Root saunters to the podium. A ruddy bookmaker and TV sports handicapper who once co-hosted a show with Jimmy "The Greek" Snyder, Root looks like a cross between "SNL"'s Darrell Hammond-as-Bill Clinton and Biff from Back To the Future. He's been itching to diversify from odds-making and TV appearances, and recently wrote the book Millionaire Republican, about "creating personal wealth in the GOP-dominated era." (It came out in 2006.) Soon after, he had his own "Libertarian awakening," as he calls it. Root's brochure baldly paints his candidacy as a pure p.r. project. His detailed "sixteen-year plan" for the party has such milestones as "Wayne hits a local college nightspot and dances with the younger set. The video makes U Tube" and "Wayne becomes a frequent guest on 'This Week with George Stephanopoulos,' Wayne's Columbia University classmate." (Stephanopoulos on Root: "I definitely didn't know him.") His other Columbia classmate? "Barrack [sic] Obama." P.r. gold.
Root grabs the mic, leaves the podium, and begins to prowl the stage like a motivational speaker, crossing back and forth in front of his frozen competitors. "I am the anti-politician! I am an s.o.b.—son of a butcher! America needs a son of a butcher! I know how to manipulate the media! First Jewish-American to run for president! First small businessman! First home- school dad! This is an opportunity of a lifetime!" His speech is all disembodied applause lines, and Root flogs and teases and massages each one for maximum impact.
Root leaves a definite mark. Compared to the low-boil Gravel, the literally and figuratively absent Barr, and the parade of amateurs that preceded him, he is the only one who seems to really enjoy being here. An impressed follower of Kubby, the pot activist, jokingly floats a "Grass-Root ticket." "I had a feeling that he was going to sell me some Ginsu knives," says another delegate when it's over. "But ... I don't know—maybe this is what we need right now?"
Saturday's big event is another debate, a formal one, nationally televised (on C-span). Since there are no primaries, all delegates have arrived officially uncommitted, and many—given microscopic variation between most contestants' platforms—may not settle on a favorite until after tonight's performance. To thin the crowded field, this year's rules require the candidates to collect 57 "tokens" each (actually paper strips) to participate in the debate and 30 more to earn a nominating speech. Soon, a rumor spreads that the threshold is going to be raised to 80 tokens at the last moment. "This is backstage dealings by the Candidate That Shall Remain Nameless," snipes Christina, Mike Gravel's (non-Wiccan) aide. Other delegates hint at coming disruptions and havoc. The mood in the room is like a high-school battle of the bands rocked by a whisper that there's a major-label rep in the audience: Instead of rehearsing, the musicians are running around backstage snipping each other's guitar strings.
In a possible preview of tomorrow's election, Ruwart and Barr are neck and neck, having amassed 94 "debate tokens" each. Barr, in a gesture his campaign trumpets as one of selflessness, gives some of his to Gravel: ostensibly to raise the level of discussion, possibly to secure Gravel's delegates later on. Gravel, surely grinning on the inside, then gives the excess of his tokens to Kubby.
Barr gets to speak first and uses the opening statement to sound every note he thinks the audience wants to hear. He delivers a forceful apology for much of his legislative record. The Patriot Act? "Shoot it, burn it, scatter the ashes." The Kyoto Protocol? "Don't force a Kyoto anything on the American people." Favorite thinker? Why, "the best philosopher of the twentieth century, Ayn Rand."
Wayne Allyn Root's favorite philosopher, by contrast, is Yogi Berra. Root replays his pitch from last night, louder, punchier, hoarser, adding a promise to deliver "twelve million of online poker enthusiasts, to whom I am a celebrity" to the party. This time, there can be no doubt this stuff works. A few men have found and adopted a barking chant—"Root! Root! Root!" "I noise- metered it," says Stephen Gordon, Barr's rail-thin, gloomy adviser, when the debate is over. He's staring at the convention hall's floor as he speaks. "Root won. Personally, it frustrates the hell out of me." Indeed, after a few hours of reflection, Root's offering of himself as an effective empty vessel for the party's message—no history, no baggage, just moxie—begins to seem brilliant.
By Sunday morning, all nerves are fraying. There's another persistent rumor—cheerful to some, frightening to others—that a last-minute busload of pissed- off anti-Barr anarchists, summoned by Kubby, is on its way to the Sheraton. Pacing in the elevator on the way from his suite to the battlefield, Steve Dasbach, the party's former national chairman who will be giving a speech nominating Barr, sourly predicts at least three ballots. "Don't cast me aside because I'm a latecomer," pleads Barr. The incantation of "Root! Root! Root!" briefly surfaces during his speech. It genuinely looks like Wayne Allyn Root's moment. He works the floor, furiously pressing flesh. Sixteen-year plan. Son of a butcher. Classmates with Obama.
There's a total of 660 delegates present, well short of the thousand predicted; the winner needs a simple majority (331) to get the nomination. At noon, the carnage begins. The first ballot has eight candidates and brings Barr 153 votes, with Mary Ruwart trailing him by one vote and Root in third place with 123, with Kubby in sixth. Gravel is a distant fourth. Two long-shots have collected less than 5 percent each and are thus cast out. Ron Paul gets six write-in votes.
Everyone takes note that not a single person from Nevada, Wayne Allyn Root's home state, voted for him. "Perhaps they know him," deadpans a delegate. The second ballot gets rid of Kubby, who, as expected, endorses Dr. Mary. On the third ballot, Barr and Mary Ruwart, her delegate haul now beefed up with Kubby supporters, are tied with 186 votes each.
The next vote is cast in ominous near-silence. No Libertarian convention had ever gone over three ballots. Even more disturbingly, the total number of voters keeps dwindling. "You know, Libertarians," sighs a California delegate. "Always off doing their own thing." When the results come in, there's a collective gasp. Barr and Dr. Mary are again in a tie, with 202 votes each. Gravel is out, and briefly becomes the most popular man in the room--until he professes no intention to endorse anyone and simply leaves.
Wayne Allyn Root's moment has passed; he has 149 delegates and no bequeathals from the now-departed second tier. His only plausible option is to parlay his third place into a vice-presidential nod from Barr, except Libertarians don't let their presidential nominees pick v.p.s at will: There's a separate nomination process. All the same, Root lunges for Barr and buttonholes him in the aisle. Their respective teams briefly form a tight circle enclosing the two men. "Now what?" Root asks Barr, brusquely—and, in the next moment, is brushed away. Shaken and ashen-faced, he storms outside and huddles with his aides, hissing something about Mary Ruwart. He is genuinely hard to look at.
On the fifth ballot, Dr. Mary pulls ahead of Barr, 229 to 223. Revolution is in the air; the room is thrumming with adrenaline. The purists—now comprehensively condensed into Mary's camp—are beginning to grin. So are Root's aides: Now Barr needs him and his 165 delegates. Root swallows his pride, walks up to Barr once again, and the two men disappear behind closed doors for about a minute. Pure politics, in miniature, on speed.
At three o'clock, Wayne Allyn Root emerges and gravely announces that he'll be Barr's v.p. His 16-year plan has now mutated into a plan "to spend sixteen years at the side of Bob Barr, learning how to be a successful politician." The purists are in shock: This is their nightmare arriviste ticket. A man named Ray jumps on a chair and yells that Barr will destroy the party in two months. The sixth ballot is cast amid criss-crossing chants of "Mary" and "Barr-Root! Barr-Root!" Then it's all over. Barr has 324 delegates, 54 percent of the remaining voters.
Down at the Capitol Bar, Christine Smith is sobbing. "Everything the Libertarian Party stood for is gone," she says. Back in the hall, a few purists stage a desperate drive for Kubby as the v.p. The idea—to stick Barr with the least compatible Number Two—has a perverse, fuck-everything, drive-this-thing- off-a-cliff tinge, but Root squeaks through on the second ballot.
Inside the hall, a hushed pandemonium breaks out. The Libertarian Party seems to be ungluing before my very eyes. After more than a few people loudly declare their intention to defect on the spot, Steve Kubby goes onstage and pleads with them to stay. Boston Tea Party, a fast-swelling offshoot composed of frustrated anarchists, has put together an alternative nominating convention around the corner, for "serious, radical, Libertarians only." Neal, Mike Gravel's Wiccan aide, says he's going to start his own Wiccan-Libertarian caucus back in Michigan. "The values are virtually identical," he says.
Three hours later, in the Barr victory suite, the winner is shaking hands with the Sumerian Libertarian, who he had visibly recoiled from earlier. This is his constituency now. Barr's aide Aleq Boyle is ecstatic: "They let the Georgia cracker in! Yeehaw!" He flicks the rim of his cowboy hat. "I have a feeling this one is going to go late. There will be splinter parties in other rooms, womanizing ... guy-a-nizing or whatever you call it. You know what to call it. They know what to call it!" Around ten p.m., several Gravel and Mary people, their heads down, their pins and buttons largely stripped, make their way into Barr's shindig. The cause is dead. Free beer is free beer.
The last time I see Gravel himself is a few blocks away, with wife Whitney and a few friends. They are mingling at Marlowe's, a bar and grill with a flashing neon martini above the entrance, outdoor seating, and an all-right ribeye. He looks perfectly happy.
Michael Idov is a contributing editor at NEW YORK magazine and the editor-in- chief of RUSSIA! magazine.
For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
18 comments
I was a California delegate to the LP convention. Wayne Allyn Root again shows his ignorance about the LP when he says he will be "the first Jewish presidential candidate from a major party." (Which is how I remember his statement.) A decades-long party insider told me that Andrea Marrou, the LP's 1992 candidate, was Jewish. As was Marrou's running mate.
- Thomas M. Sipos
June 7, 2008 at 1:26am
"She's also on the record suggesting that children should have a right to consent to sex with adults." No, she isn't (unless you mean sex between a 17 year old and an 18 year old, in which case most of America agrees with her). Ruwart IS on the record supporting a return to jury determination of capacity instead of the arbitrary number 18. Does Idov support the 10 year prison term given to a 17 year old Georgian youth for receiving oral sex from his 15 year old girl friend? Since Ruwart opposes age of dementia laws, I suppose Idov thinks she is denying the existence of Alzheimer's Disease. Those who care to read Ruwart's words and understand why she is so respected in the Libertarian Party can find her responses to questions at www.askdrruwart.com and can ask their own of her.
- Less Antman
June 7, 2008 at 7:38pm
I admire your writing style, Mr. Idov. I laughed several times while reading this suspenseful thriller of a story. You don't get anything like this from the coronation ceremonies the Ds and Rs put on, no matter how much taxpayer money they dump into those shindigs.
- Random Internet Reader #4987551
June 8, 2008 at 12:53pm
As a foreign (non US) libertarian I feel for the purist dilemma. However, you got what you got. It is now up to the libertarian community, Dr Ruwart included, to try and instill some sense into the Barr/Root ticket. Barr is probably sufficiently a political pragmatist to realise that to attract dedicated libertarians (as opposed to the loony fringe) along with marginalised US voters, in a presidential race, he needs to beam a sensible libertarian message to the entire US. If he does that adequately, he will be doing the libertarian cause justice. If he plays the libertarian jester then you just have to write off he and the next four years, go back to the drawing board, and maybe redesign the nomination process. Good luck - I'm sure all of the world's libertarian community will watch with concern. I blog as 'libertarian' on iBlog.co.za
- john
June 10, 2008 at 4:27am
I swear, this read like Frank Foer's "Swimming with Sharks" article, except the Libertarian party has less maturity and more Wicca. Hilarious.
- Dave
June 10, 2008 at 5:03pm
I was quite pleasantly surprised by this article; you did a great job of capturing the convention. I guess I'm with everybody else on this; I'm a little worried by how Barr's tone has changed from road to Damascus apology for sins and new understanding to "DOMA isn't anti-libertarian" bullshit to protect himself, but if he gets his act together he could be really great for the party. Root sounds reasonably good until you actually see the guy speak, at which point you realize that he acts and sounds like he's constipated and being attacked by fire ants.
- Jorgen
June 10, 2008 at 8:26pm
Tragicomic is right. Thank you, Michael Idov & New Republic, for helping me laugh out loud at some of what was, fundamentally, a deeply dispiriting outcome to our convention. After spending countless hours composing a beautiful symphony, only to see the marketing guys come in at the last minute and have it re-recorded in the form of elevator music, all you can do is embrace the absurdity and sit back and laugh at the spectacle, remembering that life is at root (and with Root!) a comedy. Oh, and a tip of the pirate hat to your cartoonist!
- Starchild
June 15, 2008 at 11:38am
P.S. - Hopefully, as with Mark Twain's, rumours of the demise of the Libertarian Party will eventually turn out to have been greatly exaggerated. But I'm not holding much hope for this year.
- Starchild
June 15, 2008 at 11:43am
Regardless of the colorful 'coverage' of this year's convention, in this essay, and another like it in, then if the Libertarian Party (LP) really relied upon "grass-roots" activism, as is claimed, then it would have died decades ago. After 33 years in existence, local LP candidates (whose sincerity I don't doubt for a minute) NEVER gather more than a few hundred votes, and never have. Yet, election year after election
year, the LP puts up [Sure-to-LOSE] candidates in just about all local elections. It reminds me of a homosexual man that I knew in who in 1996 when Al Gore came to town, to a very vocal-and-visual "gay rights" demonstration, bemoaned that everyone in
our county thought that the local homosexual activists were so organized, "when we're not." He would know. Yet, the perception that they were, based on daily observation of "gay rights" influence, seemed reasonable. -- The national influence due to the libertarians, achieved in only a few short decades, is staggering, especially when one considers that most people don't even know who to credit with teaching them their "opinions:" Not the LP, of course, whose primary value seems to be to keep the name “libertarian” in public view, but mostly non-LP libertarian non-governmental organizations (A.K.A. “Think Tanks”) and such. Libertarian ideology is ubiquitous, propagated by the mass-communications media (broadcast, satellite, cable, print, education system, entertainment. . . ). One does not even have to “think” to absorb it. I'm not a libertarian.
-
June 16, 2008 at 2:07am
Great article! Is there any picture with the Guy Fawkes mask fellow?
- sleepyavl
June 16, 2008 at 3:11am
Yep. That's why I left the LP after 25 years. Couldn't take the freak show. Dump the well-meaming but hapless Mr. Root, Bob. You might still have a slim chance of getting into the game.
- Jim
June 16, 2008 at 10:14am
I have run several times as a Libertarian candidate in California, three times for State Insurance Commissioner, and in 2006, received more than 300,000 votes, almost as many as the presidential candidates get from the whole country. The difference is that I am more qualified for that position than any other candidate (there were six; I was a strong third place, after the D's and R's). Better candidates mean more votes.
- commissioner
June 16, 2008 at 10:46am
The commenter's claim that Libs never get more than a few hundred votes was false at its founding (when young Michael Gilson was elected as the first LP candidate in 1972) to today in the US (Florida just got its first libertarian mayor); and there are many Libs in local office abroad (where there have been 2 Lib heads of state and many in local office in e.g. Costa Rica). In addition, Libertarians do well in appointive offices also, as part of a broad effort of education, legislative work and coalition activism. Also, the article's characterization of Gravel as a nutcase given his role in ending the draft, bringing down the Nixon administration and many other areas is outrageous. Has the writer ever looked at the really strange costumes at GOP party conventions? A little field research beyond talking to the next person in a bar who just joined, please. --R. Swanson, LP Historian
- Ralph Swanson
June 16, 2008 at 6:24pm
Age does not necessarily mean Alzheimers, and I wish you would not belittle the Holocaust like that.
- Mick
June 16, 2008 at 10:12pm
Michael, Your piteous wishful eulogy of the Libertarian Party as an influential force is incongruous with your snarky caricature of libertarian values. If we are so whacked out, why do so many prominent politicians on both left and right identify their philosophy as libertarian? The left cannot so easily rejoice in the fact that Barr will take votes from McCain, and ensure an Obama win. The lesson of '92 is that a Dem elected with a plurality against a split libertarian/conservative vote does NOT have a mandate, and must work with libertarian types in Congress to avoid an ass-kicking at the mid-term. On the term "Freedom Freaks"....let's back up a step...aren't "freaks" (extreme mutations which are less able to thrive in their society and the world) more likely to be de-selected from the species gene pool than those mutated within "normal" bounds? If so, than "freedom freaks" would seem to be a contradiction in terms ...aren't more independent members of the species more likely to survive? It seems that left-wing statists who tend to want to breast-feed off of the government's big tits their entire lives, and right-wing moralists, who tend to want to impose their dogma by force on everyone, are less likely to survive in the long run. The crime of this article is one of omission. What is not captured is that there are many mainstream libertarians out there who are sick of the non-stop growht of the government no matter which party is in charge. The philosphical appeal of libertarianism is vastly underestimated. My interviews of some of the major candidates (on joeypanto.com) reflect this sentiment, and the Ron Paul "phenomenon" is proof positive.
- Joey Panto
June 18, 2008 at 4:09pm
What scares me is the author edits Russia Magazine. Russia is more libertarian under Putin than the USA is under Bush and his Marxist-Feminist wife and allies. Does the author hate Putin? And what is with TNR's hatred of libertarianism? I remember they went out of their way to mischaracterize Ron Paul's old newsletters in terms of their relevance to our need for individual liberties today.
- Jim Peterson
June 26, 2008 at 7:58am
"Russia is more libertarian under Putin than the USA is under Bush and his Marxist-Feminist wife and allies." So, when did the state-murder plank get hammered into your platform?
- HellifIknow
June 26, 2008 at 1:21pm
what is tax
- mrityunjya
September 30, 2008 at 3:48am