SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Whatever Rick Perry’s Record Is, It’s Not Conservative

POLITICS AUGUST 19, 2011

Whatever Rick Perry’s Record Is, It’s Not Conservative

On Sunday afternoon—just 24 hours after Texas Gov. Rick Perry announced his presidential candidacy—an email arrived in my inbox titled, “14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be a Really, Really Bad President.” The article contained in the email took such a harsh tone toward Perry, I assumed, for a brief moment, that a liberal interest group was quickly jumping on the newest entrant in the Republican presidential field. In turns out, however, that the piece was the product of a right-wing website called The American Dream. The author of the article argued that Perry, the supposed savior of conservatives nationwide, is actually a RINO—a Republican in Name Only.

For Texans, this line of argument is nothing new. Indeed, for anyone who’s closely followed Perry’s tenure in Texas—as I have, covering the governor for The Texas Observer since 2003—it’s no secret that some of the state’s conservatives and libertarians dispute his conservative credentials. It’s true that Perry has trafficked heavily in anti-Washington rhetoric, especially in the run-up to his candidacy to become president. But the closer you look at Perry’s record in Texas, the harder it is to discern any coherent ideology at all. When GOP primary voters in other parts of the country examine his signature legislative accomplishments and policy stances, some won’t like what they find. 

The first Perry proposal to rile some Texas right-wing activists was the Trans-Texas Corridor—an ambitious plan to cover the state in a series of toll roads. Perry first pitched the idea during his 2002 campaign for governor. The plan would have used government’s eminent domain authority to seize rural farmland not just for multi-lane tolled highways, but also for rail and utility lines. Perry’s office and the Texas Department of Transportation gained legislative approval for the plan in 2003. The state handed the contract for the road planning and building to a Spanish-based company named Cintra. 

The backlash from rural Republicans was intense. It was a text-book example of a policy that classic small-government conservatives would hate: Seizing farmland with eminent domain, then handing public money to a foreign company that would built roads Texans would have pay tolls to drive on. Anti-Trans Texas Corridor buttons soon became one of the most popular items among delegates at Republican State Party Conventions in 2004, 2006 and 2008. 

Perry’s plan for a comprehensive network of toll-roads would eventually die slowly over the next four legislative sessions, meeting resistance from conservative Republicans. Toll roads are still being built in Texas, but the corridor plan is remembered as a colossal failure for the governor.

Perry caused conservative revulsion again in 2007 when he proposed that all young girls in Texas receive the HPV vaccine. The drug company Merck had just put the drug on the market, and the governor’s office made a heart-wrenching case for why all Texans should have access to it. His office brought to the Legislature a young woman with terminal cervical cancer, caused by HPV, to meet with the press and argue for mandatory vaccinations.

Some Texas Democrats agreed with Perry’s position. But the governor’s critics also pointed out that Perry’s former chief of staff, Mike Toomey, was serving as a lobbyist for Merck, which stood to make millions from the vaccine requirement. In the end, conservative Republicans in the Legislature bucked at the thought of requiring young girls to receive an STD vaccine, and Perry's effort died in the Legislature.

Then there’s the one major proposal that Perry did, in fact, pass into law—the state’s business tax. This tax increase on business was crafted in 2006 as part of a school-finance reform. The idea was to cut local property taxes and replace the lost revenue with a new business margins tax. This 2006 tax “swap” was the one instance during Perry’s decade as governor when he proposed a wide-ranging plan and successfully pushed it through the Legislature mostly unchanged. It will likely be remembered as his signature legislative accomplishment.

The problem is, it’s been a disaster. Small businesses hate it because they’re forced to pay regardless of whether they’re turning a profit: it seemed to be the very definition of a “job-killing” tax. Some conservatives simply hate it on principle. A few even argued that Perry’s business tax is unconstitutional—amounting to a tax on income, which is forbidden by the Texas Constitution.

But worst of all, the tax doesn’t even generate enough revenue. The tax “swap” has cost the state $5 billion a year for five years running. The Texas budget now faces an ongoing structural deficit because of the underperforming business tax. And with a tax increase on small business and a structural budget deficit to boot, it’s clear that Perry hasn’t taken conservative economists like Milton Friedman as his inspiration.

Another example of his conservative heresy is the Texas Enterprise Fund, which Perry seem to be especially proud of. The purpose of the Fund is to dole out public money to lure companies to Texas. It has created tens of thousands of jobs in the state, but critics have not incorrectly, labeled it “corporate welfare,” a slush fund for well-connected businesses. The Observer investigated the fund in 2010 and found that several companies with political ties to Perry had received state grants. Some Texas Tea Party activists have been especially critical of Perry's Enterprise Fund, labeling it a quintessential example of wasteful government spending.

None of this is to say that Perry has been ineffectual in office. He has used his veto power (or the threat of it) to repeatedly bend the Legislature to his wishes. And he’s utilized his power of appointment to build a web of political patronage that stretches across every entity in state government.

But while he's a charismatic campaigner, a natural performer with keen political instincts, there's no ideological compass that guides his policy decisions once the elections are over. The specifics of his positions are often a matter of expedience. For instance, over the course of this year, as Perry has been considering his run for president, Texans have watched him take hard-line conservative positions on immigration. Prior to 2011, Perry—much like George W. Bush—had been a moderate on immigration, a history that may end up harming him in the GOP presidential primary.

As governor of Texas, Perry’s lack of policy depth hasn’t hindered him much. He simply lets the Legislature do the heavy lifting. When the Legislature isn’t in session, Perry is largely content to float from one public appearance to another, cheerleading the Texas economy. He rarely bothers to diagnose the state’s problems, or offer any novel solutions. 

When Perry does involve himself in policy debates, the most consistent thread is that he has sided with big business—that is to say, with industries big enough, or fortuitous enough, to have strong connections with the state government. It's a pattern that repeats itself not only in the HPV and Trans-Texas Corridor episodes—both of which would have been bonanzas for select companies—but in his business-friendly approach to immigration and job-creation programs.

In many ways, Perry is quite conservative. He espouses limited government, low taxes and light regulation. But in his 10 years as governor, he’s often strayed from conservative orthodoxy. If there’s one phrase that best describes Perry’s governing ideology, it isn’t “conservative.” It’s crony capitalism.

Dave Mann is editor of The Texas Observer.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 23 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

23 comments

Wait a minute. Are you sure this article is about Rick Perry? It sounds uncommonly reminiscent of one George W. Bush. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

- Dausuul

August 19, 2011 at 12:50am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You would need to be mentally unbalanced to select Rick Perry as the republican, presidential nominee. Therefore it should come as no surprise if that is exactly what happens.

- bluecoyote

August 19, 2011 at 12:59am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I hope that the Texas governor wins his party's nomination. The national contest will be an entertainment worth every dime of the federal taxes I paid last year and more. This Prius driving , croissant munching liberal is already in his seat waiting for the show to start.

- paskunac

August 19, 2011 at 6:43am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

OMG. Does this mean that Rick Perry might be pragmatic with that Clintonian ability to connect with voters who like that "good-looking rascal"? source: Bill Clinton's descriptor. I agree with paskunac - Perry sure has made this entertaining instead of a depressing snoozer. After all, Clint Eastwood is not in the contest, so Perry will have to do.

- K2K

August 19, 2011 at 8:33am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Crony capitalism? Really? How could that possibly make him a RINO? He is the heart and soul of the Republican party, unprincipled and shilling for capitalist cronies.

- roidubouloi

August 19, 2011 at 10:04am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

roi: I take your larger point, but I decided that "RINO" was a meaningless term (beyond serving as a symptom of the Right's current mania) the moment it was applied to Newt Gingrich.

- frippo

August 19, 2011 at 11:37am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

frippo is correct. based on a very random scanning of commenters at PJM when I am really bored, the term RINO these days seems to mean anyone except Sarah Palin.

- K2K

August 19, 2011 at 12:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Dausuul pretty much nails it. Just have to add (with thanks to Doonesbury); isn't Perry the very essence of a "suit?

- skahn

August 19, 2011 at 12:39pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well well well, looks like we Democrats might remember how to politicians after all: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/08/obamas-education-secretary-slams-perrys-texas-i-feel-very-very-badly-for-the-children-there.php?ref=fpblg#0_undefined,0_

- WandreyCer

August 19, 2011 at 2:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is taking a rhetorical shot at one of President Obama's possible election opponents, slamming the education system in Gov. Rick Perry's home state of Texas. "Far too few of their high school graduates are actually prepared to go on to college," Duncan said on Bloomberg Television. "I feel very, very badly for the children there." "You have seen massive increases in class size," Duncan also added. "You've seen cutbacks in funding. It doesn't serve the children well. It doesn't serve the state well. It doesn't serve the state's economy well. And ultimately it hurts the country." When asked for comment by Bloomberg News, Perry campaign spokesman Mark Miner fired back. "The president's secretary of education may want to do a little more homework before commenting on education in Texas," said Miner. "Under Governor Perry, Texas has been a national leader in adopting college and career-ready curriculum standards that will ensure Texas students graduate prepared to succeed in college and the workplace."

- WandreyCer

August 19, 2011 at 2:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

As a professor in a Texas public university, I get to teach kids coming from the Texas public schools. They're very well-prepared for bluffing through standardized tests, and they've developed a truly magnificent sense of entitlement to high grades for no work. Their preparation for abstract thinking, scientific reasoning, clear writing, and hard work, not so good. To some extent that describes freshman anywhere. But I've taught in a few other states before moving to Texas (to be near my wife's family, not because of the Perry economy, in case you're wondering) and Texas has the shittiest schools by far.

- krlong014

August 19, 2011 at 2:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Well krlong, case closed. Thank you.

- WandreyCer

August 19, 2011 at 3:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

krlong014: "They're very well-prepared for bluffing through standardized tests, and they've developed a truly magnificent sense of entitlement to high grades for no work. " You really dislike these kids, don't you? I wouldn't like to have you as a teacher for my kids, that's for sure.

- noga1

August 19, 2011 at 4:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

and they've developed a truly magnificent sense of entitlement to high grades for no work. Well, Gov. Perry seems to consider himself entitled to the highest office in the land with few accomplishments, so I guess he truly is the "poster child" for the entitlement culture you describe.

- skahn

August 19, 2011 at 5:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What a bitchy - not to mention hilariously patronizing thing to say Noga - too bad we're not all as manifestly angelic as you. Yes, those poor dears can't possibly deal with someone speaking about them as real, fully actualized people, warts and all. Most of them would no doubt agree with krlong with a good laugh. BTW - do you teach freshmen in Texas? Didn't think so. I've worked with adolescents for years and adore it. Study after study has illustrated the issue of been steady grade-inflation for many years and yes inter-generational challenges are always there. So what. Get over yourself.

- WandreyCer

August 19, 2011 at 7:06pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Noga, if you've passed on to your kids your inability to distinguish frank criticism from dislike or disrespect, then it's true they probably wouldn't want me as their professor. Fine, many of my lower-division undergrads don't like me much. But then a few semesters later it sinks in that they actually learned something from that SOB who made them work, write, and think. Then they sign up for my upper-division courses or stop by my office for help with the math in their upper-level engineering or physics or chemistry courses. And because it eventually dawns on them that real-world engineering, chemistry, business and medicine are about open-ended, creative problem solving instead of rote memorization and turn-the-crank calculation, they understand why I tortured them with all those calculus word problems.

- krlong014

August 19, 2011 at 8:01pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I'd also like to add that it's not the job of professors to "like" their students (although I like most of mine despite their [fill in range of negative traits] and their mixture of cluelessness and youthful resilience. It's our job to teach them and help them along the road of becoming thinking adults, and liking is a kind of annex to that rather than the main deal. Naturally, if you didn't in some way at least enjoy the company of young people with all their foibles, then perhaps you really shouldn't be a college teacher. But I didn't get from krlong's original post that he disliked his students, more that he found their lack of a sense of the real world amusing as well as worrying.

- ironyroad

August 19, 2011 at 8:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Noga, though it should be obvious given my chosen profession, I should add that I don't dislike students. I left a rather lucrative career in defense R&D for the opportunity to help train the next generation of undergrad and graduate students. Its not the students' fault they're badly prepared, and indeed many of them know how poorly they've been served by the high-stakes testing culture. Nor do I dislike their HS teachers, who are for the most part doing the best they can for low pay in horrible working conditions, with constant interference from the state government. The people who do annoy me are those occasional parents who think their kid deserves to pass despite skipping most of the homework and failing all exams, and after finals call me up to plead for their students. The students themselves are invariably embarrassed by this (god knows I'd have been mortified had my mother ever called up one of my professors!). They know they've failed, and they know who's responsible for their poor grade. So some friendly advice: don't worry if your kids get a hard-ass professor. They may or may not pass, they may or may not enjoy the experience, but pass or fail they will learn something. Hopefully they'll learn math or chemistry or whatever, but if nothing else they may learn some sense of personal responsibility. Give them the space to fail, and to learn from it. As one of my own mentors put it: "every student has the right to fail."

- krlong014

August 19, 2011 at 9:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The article is a bit embarrassing to me. As a conservative I hate crony capitalism, corporate welfare, whatever you want to call it. But there is the fact that Texas is in good economic shape in both the public and private sectors compared to most states, certainly compared to almost all liberal states. Unprincipled though it be, Perry's pseudo-conservatism produces a lot better results than left-liberalism. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I offer you the state of California as Exhibit A. The American people sense the truth of what I'm saying. They don't like Republicans - who does? But Republicans produce a lot better results than does a party owned by public employee unions and by ethnic groups whose politics doesn't go beyond playing the victim and demanding to be supported by the taxpayer.

- bulbman1066

August 20, 2011 at 1:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

While Bush was president, Perry's Texas lost 178,000 private sector jobs. Under Obama, using federal funds, Perry's state has gained 125,000 public sector jobs. Them Republicans, they sure know how to create jobs--feed at the government trough! I don't blame Republicans. The private sector, although making record profits, is giving Republicans and all other Americans the finger. Anal-retentive rich people and corporations are not job creators--the government is. It's America's future Get used to it.

- magboy47.

August 20, 2011 at 2:05am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Bulb, please see the plethora of articles debunking the myth of the Texas miracle. California is dysfunctional for reasons having nothing to do with either liberalism or conservatism. As long as the ballot proposition system remains in place its budget will be a disaster. Even so, if I recall its budget is in better shape than Texas'.

- krlong014

August 20, 2011 at 2:08am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Complete nonsense, bulb. Rank states by teen pregnancy, per capita income, educational achievement, health and you can clearly divide the red from the blue that way. The red predominate with the highest teen pregnancy rates, lowest income, lowest educational achievement, poorest health. In other words, anyplace governed according to your (an Perry's) lights is pretty sure to suck. Now imagine those red states if they weren't buoyed by transfer payments from the prosperous blue states. The divide would be much worse. You have no idea what you are talking about, as usual. The reason for this, bulb, is that reality exists. Governing by the variety of faith-based nostrums to which you subscribe, such as all of supply-side pseudo-economics and libertarian drivel, doesn't work because they are completely disconnected from reality. As, apparently, are you.

- roidubouloi

August 20, 2011 at 7:16am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

If the similarity to W holds, then all Perry has to do during the nominating and campaign process is to deny, deny, deny. Bush turned several issues 180 degrees from the historical truth, such as his insistent opposition and repeated veto of a patients' bill of rights law; instead he claimed he supported the law. Truth seems to take a holiday during campaigns, even with the selectively focused "fact checking" web sites and news columns that abound these days.

- wamba1

August 20, 2011 at 5:52pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close