POLITICS APRIL 8, 2010
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

WASHINGTON -- There is a dispiriting and, yes, heartbreaking sameness about how we respond to mining disasters.
The catastrophe at the Upper Big Branch Mine in Montcoal, W.Va., has taken at least 25 lives. An entire community stands in solidarity with the families of the victims, and hopes that some miners still trapped may yet be rescued.
We celebrate the stoic sturdiness of mine workers who pursue their craft with pride, bravery, and full knowledge of the risks it entails.
Then we get to the questions about what might have been done to avert the disaster. What was the role of the company that ran the mine? What are the responsibilities of lawmakers and government regulators whose job it is to devise and enforce rules to protect those who, as an old union song put it, dig the coal so the world can run?
We went through exactly this cycle after the Sago Mine catastrophe that took 12 lives in January of 2006. Later in the year, Congress passed the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act. The MINER Act, as it is known, is "the most significant mine safety legislation in 30 years," according to the Mine Safety and Health Administration's Web site.
The law strengthened the agency's staff, increased penalties for violations and, as The Washington Post reported, "led to a higher number of citations and penalties -- and more challenges by companies."
That last phrase is important. Companies just don't like regulation, and Don L. Blankenship, the chief executive of Massey Energy Co., has a history of challenging the regulators in every way he can.
Massey's Upper Big Branch Mine has been cited for safety violations 1,342 times since 2005. Eighty-six of those citations involved failing to follow a mine ventilation plan to control methane and coal dust, 12 of them coming last month alone.
Not surprisingly, Blankenship views this as the cost of doing business. "Violations are unfortunately a normal part of the mining process," he said in a radio interview with West Virginia Metro News. "There are violations at every coal mine in America and UBB (Upper Big Branch) was a mine that had violations."
Congress will no doubt have hearings on this and we will learn just how "normal" Massey's operation of Upper Big Branch was. According to The New York Times, the company appealed at least 37 of the 50 citations it received for serious safety violations in the last year.
Blankenship is also a poster child for why we need campaign finance laws, and why recent moves by the U.S. Supreme Court to weaken them are so dangerous. Blankenship spent $3 million to help elect a justice to the West Virginia Supreme Court who then twice provided the key vote that set aside a $50 million jury verdict against Massey.
Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that judges must disqualify themselves in cases involving litigants from whom they received large campaign contributions. But the margin on that case was only 5-4. Chief Justice John Roberts, one of the dissenters, argued that the majority's decision "will inevitably lead to an increase in allegations that judges are biased, however groundless those charges may be." No, don't question those judges, even when their campaigns get 3 million bucks.
That particular case concerned fraud, not mine regulation. But there's a pattern here to which we should pay heed, and it involves power. Too often, regulations are discussed in the abstract as a "burden" on companies that expend substantial sums to resist them.
Only after disasters such as this one do we remember that regulations exist for a reason, that their enforcement can, literally, be a matter of life and death. We will eventually learn what went wrong at Upper Big Branch and whether the safety violations were part of the problem. But then what will we do?
In the 30th anniversary edition of his classic book "Everything in Its Path," the sociologist Kai Erikson reflects on the meaning of an earlier West Virginia mining country disaster that he wrote about so powerfully, the 1972 flood in Logan County's Buffalo Creek.
Pondering his research in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Erikson concludes that we live in "a world in which the most vulnerable of people end up taking the brunt of disasters resulting both from natural processes and from human activities." Perhaps the world will always be this way. But can't we bend it toward justice, at least a little bit?
E.J. Dionne's e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
E.J. Dionne, Jr. is the author of the recently published Souled Out: Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right. He is a Washington Post columnist, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a professor at Georgetown University.
(c) 2009, Washington Post Writers Group
For more TNR, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
7 comments
And the right wonders why we need unions. This is the reason, written in blood and tears. Again. Can we bend it towards justice? Not as long as long as the Blankenships of this world exist.
- tnmats
April 8, 2010 at 9:34am
I wish some jury in the US would have the balls to indict that sob for negligent homicide if it is shown that the accident could easily have been preventable if the violations had been attended to instead of contested. If the buck has to stop somewhere it should be on Blankenshits head. And change the venue out of WVA (because an unbiased jury would be impossible), move it to Maryland or Pa.
- blackton
April 8, 2010 at 11:02am
That's right--people will never learn that we (ie, society, workers, individuals) need rules and regulations because "the market" (companies, businesses, CEO's) will not magically step up to do what's right. The cost/benefit analysis just doesn't work out. What's a few 10's or 100's of employees lives? There are unemployed ready to step in. Why pay $x000,000 for infrastructure improvements when it's more efficient to fix or abandon something after the fact? Libertarians, anti-government types, Tea baggers, whatever. You think government is the problem? What freakin' planet are you on? Greed is an essence of humanity. If you believe religion is there to guide our lives, you acknowledge that the desire (or at least, willingness) to steal, murder, adulter, covet, etc is ingrained in humanity. People CAN NOT be trusted to do the right thing is matters of economic self interest. Unions, yes. Regulation, more yes. Recognition of these basic facts? That's what we need most of all. Make everyone who's against regulation (or who fights them) actually do the work in the area they are fighting so hard to avoid cleaning up. Rotate a week at a time, continuously. Maybe with some skin in the game, they'll find some humanity.
- ericad
April 8, 2010 at 12:35pm
Blackie, to indict/convict him on such charges would require a DA, attorney general or US attorney to prosecute. I don't see that happening.
- tnmats
April 8, 2010 at 1:51pm
I personally would like to see Blankenship forced to work in one of his mines, the one with the worst safety record, for 10 years, in the most dangerous capacity. And all of his family, including elderly parents (if there are any) and any relatives to boot. Watch the mines be in tip-top shape at that point. I'm reminded of something my brother, a restaurant owner, once told me. "I won't do it in my kitchen if I don't feel comfortable with my wife and boys eating there." Seems like a simple enough motto to live by in any business.
- tnmats
April 8, 2010 at 1:54pm
Here are some statistics showing the trend in coal mine safety. http://www.aolnews.com/the-grid/article/despite-danger-us-coal-mining-deaths-are-rare/19428382
- bulbman1066
April 9, 2010 at 9:56pm
And note that in 2010 the number of deaths is already spiking up again with 29 already and counting, and the year is just starting. The deaths this time weren't necessary and this mine operator is in a class by himself for safety issues.
- tnmats
April 12, 2010 at 11:27am