SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home The Message Keeper

NOVEMBER 5, 2008

The Message Keeper

In 1992, a Chicago woman named Bettylu Saltzman met Barack Obama, who had graduated from Harvard Law School one year earlier and was now in her city leading a voter-registration drive called Project Vote. Saltzman, an heiress to a shopping-mall fortune who's long been active in Democratic politics, was volunteering for Bill Clinton's presidential bid when, one day, Obama dropped by the campaign's Chicago office to discuss Project Vote. Saltzman came away from the encounter very, very impressed. "It could have been because I was working in a presidential campaign that I was thinking this way," Saltzman recently recalled for me, "but, after meeting Barack, I told a number of people that I thought he'd be president some day, and he'd be our first black president."

One of the people Saltzman told was David Axelrod, whom she had first gotten to know while working on Paul Simon's victorious 1984 U.S. Senate campaign, which Axelrod, at the age of 29, had managed. Since then, Axelrod had gone on to become Saltzman's good friend (they have Chicago Bulls season tickets next to each other) and the preeminent Democratic political and media consultant in Chicago, having spearheaded Richard M. Daley's recent election as mayor. Intrigued, Axelrod soon set up a meeting with Obama. For him, it was little more than a favor to a friend and, possibly, a political scouting trip. But, for the 30-year-old Obama, who had come to Chicago with dreams of becoming mayor himself, it was a crucial encounter with the person who could help him achieve that ambition.

Initially, though, Obama failed to make the sort of impression on Axelrod that he had made on Saltzman. Although their meeting led to the two becoming friends who would socialize and play basketball together, Obama and Axelrod's relationship was more personal than political--with Axelrod always maintaining a professional distance from Obama during the early years of Obama's political career. To be sure, Obama used Axelrod as an informal sounding board when he ran for the state Senate and got Axelrod to host a fund-raiser for him when his district was redrawn to include Axelrod's downtown neighborhood. But, despite his best efforts, Obama was unable to convince Axelrod to take him on as a client. When he ran for Congress in 2000, trying to unseat Bobby Rush, Axelrod sat on the sidelines. Ostensibly, Axelrod took a pass because he didn't want his working for Obama to be construed as payback by Daley, whom Rush had unsuccessfully challenged for mayor the year before. But Chris Sautter, an Axelrod friend who wound up working as Obama's media consultant on that losing campaign, says, "I think David was also pretty down on Obama's chances." And, a few years later, when Obama first approached Axelrod about joining his 2004 campaign for the U.S. Senate, Axelrod demurred. Indeed, according to David Mendell's biography of Obama, Axelrod told Obama to forget about statewide office altogether. "If I were you," he advised, "I would wait until Daley retires and then look at a mayor's race."

But Obama kept courting Axelrod, because Axelrod had proven the master of the key to Obama's political future: He knew how to sell black candidates to white voters. It's a formula Axelrod developed working on a series of black mayoral candidates' campaigns in cities such as Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. Once Obama finally won him over, in 2002, Axelrod used it to elect Obama to the U.S. Senate. And now, with Axelrod serving as the Obama campaign's chief political and media strategist, that formula is poised to send the first African American to the White House. "It was always very important to Barack to have Axelrod in his corner," says Valerie Jarrett, a close friend of Obama's and now a senior adviser to his campaign. "He thought Axelrod would bring just the right expertise to the equation."

 

 

 

His political consulting career may seem charmed, but Axelrod's life has been marked by tragedy. When he was 19 years old and a junior at the University of Chicago, his father, a New York City psychologist--"my best friend and hero, " as Axelrod once described him--committed suicide. Later, Axelrod experienced the other side of paternal despair, when his daughter Lauren suffered epileptic seizures that left her with irreversible brain damage. Later still, his wife Susan, who runs an organization that promotes epilepsy research, waged a harrowing but successful battle with breast cancer. "A lot of people who enter public life have some kind of difficult situation in their pasts--they come from broken homes, their fathers left, they're orphans--and they're looking for something in public life they didn't get in their personal lives," says one Axelrod friend. "Because David's experienced his own tragedies, there's just an empathetic quality and ability to commiserate with some of these folks and to channel their energy and message in constructive ways."

Axelrod began his career as a political reporter for the Chicago Tribune, but, in 1984, he left journalism and, after his work on Simon's campaign, opened his own political and media consulting firm in Chicago. "There are some disadvantages to being in Chicago when you're competing for federal races with the inside-the-Beltway firms," says John Kupper, who's worked with Axelrod since 1988. "We ended up doing more non-federal races, like mayoral races. We made a virtue out of necessity." Of course, the racial demographics of America's cities also necessitated Axelrod working for an unusual number of African American candidates. "The fact is, in most major cities these days, the voting majority is minority," Kupper explains. "So, as we've gone along here and picked up mayoral races, a lot of the clients have been African Americans."

Unlike many consultants, who impose their own messages and buzzwords on candidates--so much so that their clients all begin to sound alike--Axelrod is known for crafting campaigns that are centered on, and uniquely suited to, his candidates' biographies. As a result, when the mustachioed, disheveled Axelrod goes on television to offer spin, he tends to sound like his clients. "Even in casual conversation, he begins adopting the tone and language of the candidate he's working with," says Gordon Fischer, a former chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party who's worked alongside Axelrod on several campaigns. Or, as GOP consultant Mark McKinnon, who teamed up with Axelrod on a Houston mayoral race in 1991 back when McKinnon was a Democrat, put it to me: "David just does a Vulcan mind meld with his candidates." This ability to understand his clients has become one of Axelrod's greatest selling points. Former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack remembers interviewing Axelrod to work on his 1998 campaign. "His shirt was kind of untucked and his hair was a little bit windblown. He walked in and I said to myself, 'This guy kind of looks like me; if he looks like me, I bet he can sell me.'"

Even those politicians who look nothing like Axelrod believe he's able to relate to them. "There are very few people who happen to be white who are sensitive and willing to give their all and commit themselves to candidates of color," says Dennis Archer, the former mayor of Detroit and one of the many black mayoral candidates who relied on Axelrod's services. "Some come in with a pejorative sense and treat the candidate in a pejorative way, and you don't have the full, committed respect that David has displayed."

 

 

In 1989, Axelrod served as the political and media strategist for Michael White, a black Ohio state senator, in his bid for mayor of Cleveland. As Cleveland was the first major U.S. city to elect a black mayor--Carl B. Stokes in 1967--White's campaign was hardly unprecedented. Indeed, White's opponent in the general election, the president of Cleveland's city council, George Forbes, was also black. Because he couldn't count on an overwhelming number of black votes, White needed to win a sizable share of whites. The hot-tempered Forbes ran an aggressively negative campaign, accusing White of being a "slum landlord" and of abusing his former wife. But Axelrod realized that the key for White was not responding to those attacks and reducing the campaign to a contest between two angry black men--even when White was understandably tempted to do so. "When you have someone beating your brains out, the human temptation is, 'I'm going to go out in the middle of the ring and pulverize this guy,'" White says. "David's advice was to avoid doing that. He was right, of course, but you're not always so logical when you're bleeding." In fact, the story of White's personal growth--in which he matured from a militant student leader at Ohio State University in the early '70s into a mild-mannered MPA who refused to mix it up with Forbes--became a centerpiece of his campaign. "I spent some time being mad," he would say. "But I channeled my anger into constructive change."

Axelrod believed the other crucial vehicle for winning his candidate the votes of Cleveland's white residents was what he's called "third-party authentication"--in other words, endorsements from respected individuals or institutions that whites put a lot of stock in. "David felt there almost had to be a permission structure set up for certain white voters to consider a black candidate," explains Ken Snyder, a Democratic consultant and Axelrod

protégé . In Cleveland, that was the city's daily newspaper, The Plain Dealer. Largely on the basis of The Plain Dealer's endorsement and his personal story, White went on to defeat Forbes with 81 percent of the vote in the city's white wards.

Ten years later, Axelrod went to work on John Street's campaign for Philadelphia mayor. The candidate whom Street most resembled was White's old opponent, Forbes. Like Forbes, Street was the president of the city council who was infamous for his temper: As a young councilman, he had once shoved a TV reporter and thrown water in someone's face. Street needed a significant share of the white vote to win the race. In order to get that, he'd need to erase white Philadelphians' image of him as a hothead. Axelrod's strategy for doing this centered on Street's TV ads--which took a thenunusual documentary approach. "David would sit there for hours literally conducting interviews with Street, with Street looking just slightly off-camera answering David's questions," recalls Snyder, who was Street's campaign spokesman. "Then David would go back to the studio. It was a really hard jigsaw puzzle to put together--Street would say something nine seconds long and you only have seven seconds left in the spot--but David thought it was worth the time and effort spent because it allowed for voters to make a gut-level connection with Street. ... It's hard to accept a stereotype about a person when he's in your living room talking to you and you see that he's a real living human being with a certain set of experiences you can relate to." Street wound up winning an achingly close race, with a final margin of victory of fewer than 8,000 votes (out of 425,000 cast).

In 2006, Axelrod faced what was at that point his biggest challenge in Deval Patrick's campaign for governor of Massachusetts. Unlike almost all of Axelrod's black mayoral clients, who were following in the footsteps of other black mayors in their respective cities, Patrick was running for an office no black politician in his state had ever reached before. Like most Axelrod campaigns, Patrick's focused more on the candidate's biography than policy: Patrick's most effective TV ad dwelled on his life story--"raised by a single mother," "worked his way up from poverty to Harvard Law"--while giving short shrift to, as it described them, Patrick's "honest ideas to lift our state." But, rather than try to downplay or defuse Patrick's race, Axelrod used it as part of his appeal to white voters, casting his bid to become Massachusetts's first black governor as an opportunity for voters to make history themselves. Rob Gray, a GOP consultant who helped run the campaign of Patrick's opponent, Kerry Healey, says: "Part of the Patrick campaign was challenging white voters who might feel somewhat guilfty about racial attitudes in the state and the country to exorcise that guilt by voting for the African American candidate. ... 'Making history' can be very motivational to people in terms of their voting behavior."

Around the time Axelrod was steering Patrick to victory in 2006, he was urging Obama to run for the White House in 2008. "David felt the time was right and the environment was right," says John Kupper. "You don't know if four or eight or twelve years down the line conditions will have changed and if they don't, whether there'll be a newer Obama." The self-described "keeper of the message" for Obama's presidential bid has taken the lessons he learned from his mayoral and gubernatorial campaigns and made them cohere into something that approaches a unified theory of how to elect a black candidate--emphasizing biography, using third-party authentication, attacking with an unconventional sideways approach, letting voters connect to the candidate by speaking to them directly in ads, and telling voters that supporting the black candidate puts them on the right side of history.

In the fall of 2007, pundits and Obama supporters, frustrated by what they perceived as a listless campaign, worried that Obama's run might be over before it had even really begun. They urged Obama to take the fight to Clinton in personal terms, but Obama refused. That didn't mean, however, that he didn't go negative on Clinton; rather, he went negative in a way that was subtle enough so as not to mark himself as angry. "I remember Obama would have this riff, where he was like, what we need is change, not old-style thinking; conviction, not triangulation," says former Clinton adviser Howard Wolfson. "And all the things we needed were him, all the things we didn't need were us. And yet he never said our name. It was brilliantly effective."

The week before Super Tuesday, caught in a delegate-by-delegate race against Clinton, Obama deployed perhaps the most powerful third-party authenticators in the Democratic Party, Ted and Caroline Kennedy. It wasn't the first time the scion of an iconic white Democratic family had been used by Axelrod on Obama's behalf. In his 2004 campaign for the Senate, Axelrod recognized how important it was for Obama to have the support of someone white Illinois voters trusted, and he had lined up Paul Simon to play that role. But, when Simon passed away after heart surgery, Axelrod enlisted Simon's daughter Sheila, a city councilwoman in Carbondale, instead; the ad Sheila Simon made, in which she said that Obama and her father were "cut from the same cloth," has been credited with helping to spark a 20-point leap in the polls for Obama. And, as the presidential primary season trudged along, female authenticators like Kathleen Sebelius and Janet Napolitano became his most familiar surrogates. Even the sea of diverse but mostly white faces standing behind Obama on risers at his campaign events--a tableau that is carefully arranged by Obama campaign aides--serves as a form of third-party authentication.

In early September, following the GOP convention and McCain's rise in the polls, the Obama campaign faced its most difficult juncture since it was urged to attack Hillary Clinton. Many Democrats were in a panic over Obama's refusal to match McCain attack for attack. But, like the White campaign in Cleveland that Axelrod ran, the Obama campaign took a different approach--responding instead with ads that tried to turn McCain's negative attacks against him by denouncing them as a distraction and dishonorable. "There are certain things we're not going to say in ads," explains John Del Cecato, a partner in Axelrod's firm who is a media adviser to Obama's campaign. "I think sometimes people don't understand our strategy: They think it's either go for the jugular or you're treating them with kid gloves. There is an in-between."

Again and again, the ads that the Obama campaign has unveiled at the race's most critical moments--on the eve of the Iowa caucus, in the aftermath of the global financial meltdown--have featured the candidate talking in an informal manner directly to the camera, much like John Street did in Philadelphia. By doing so, Obama has tried to show that he's relatable and reasonable--not the radical figure white voters may have read about on the Internet and nothing like their worst images of black politicians. The ads that have featured pictures of Obama as a child with his white mother and grandparents and footage of him as an adult easily interacting with white voters (Axelrod has had camera crews following Obama at virtually all of his public appearances since 2003) have only served to reinforce that message. At the same time, Obama, like Patrick, has used his race to project a message of hope and change for voters who may be receptive to such a pitch. Indeed, one reason he's been able to be so vague and general in his promise of change is because the color of his skin serves as a constant reminder of just how concrete, in one way at least, that change would be.

With Obama ahead in the polls, that message that favors biography over policy looks as if it may be enough to get him to the White House. But what about afterward? After all, the electoral successes Axelrod has brought to his black clients have not always been matched by governing successes, as the troubled tenures of Street in Philadelphia and now Patrick in Massachusetts have shown. In fact, Axelrod's friends say it's not uncommon for him to grow disillusioned with his clients once they take office. (According to one friend, Axelrod has even confessed that, had Obama not run for the White House, he would have left political consulting altogether.) Will a President Obama somehow be different? And, if so, will Axelrod be in any way responsible for that difference? He's said that he has no plans to work in an Obama White House and that he intends to remain in Chicago. If he's able to make good on Bettylu Saltzman's long-ago prediction, perhaps David Axelrod will feel his job is done.

Jason Zengerle is a senior editor at The New Republic. 

 

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

This article originally ran in the November 5, 2008, issue of the magazine.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 33 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

33 comments

Gosh, a gushing piece about Axelrod, just like the gushing piece about Jarrett (who is one of the people who has made millions allowing low income housing to rot-see Boston Globe, Grim Proving Ground for Obama's Housing Policy, June 27, 2008). Funny you don't mention a few facts: What did Hillary Clinton in? Implying that she and her husband, two people who have done so much for civil rights, are racist (her ratings with African Americans dropped like a rock after Obama questioned her MLK/Johnson quote, fairy tale, etc.). What will probably do McCain in? Painting him and Palin as evil and stupid and racist for bringing up Ayers and Rezko and anyone else of concern in Obama's inner circle (yes, inner circle). Why can't you even acknowledge this and at least attempt to debunk it? Do you think your readers are paying absolutely no attention?

- susan k. (NYC)

October 21, 2008 at 1:11am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It will indeed test Axelrod's convictions--his intentions to leave the business will be countered with the most extraordinary offers of chinga, since a man who can get a black man elected President of the United States can LITERALLY name his own price.

- huston3

October 21, 2008 at 10:30am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Let's hope that Obama can live up to the image Axlerod has created. What I respect about Axlerod's method is his willingness to project an appeal to our higher natures upon the candidates he shapes. while the idea of a manufactured image running for President is repugnant to me on a gut level, it is so much more admirable than the Rovian style of using fear and projecting negatives upon the opposition. I suppose we shall shortly see whose method is the greater.

- Mark Birdsall

October 21, 2008 at 10:54am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Dear Susan, You sound so much like the rest of the McSameinites. You just make up lies wherever you think they might work. The truth is: Obama never called Clinton a racist. The media and several other american citizens said his comment regarding Jesse Jackson comparative to Obama implied racism. Did Obama repute their statements, no. How could he. No man ever really knows what is in the thoughts of another when they make a statement. Get a life Susan, and stop hating and sucking on those sour grapes.

- Wisconsinites for Obama-Biden 08

October 21, 2008 at 12:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Axelrod also seems to have an even temperment and does not rile easily, nor does he seem to use low-ball tactics. It is good that Barack has positive people around him to give him guidance. People want their politicians to do the right things. To have morals and ethics. To be better then them, so they can have trust and be inspired to also be and do better.

- Angellight

October 21, 2008 at 1:54pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Susan K: McCain will do himself in, basically because his policies are bankrupt and out of step with modernity, his Veep pick is a transparent token, and there are real doubts that he'll live out his term. He doesn't need help with anyone else. Tony Reszko was not under investigation or indictment nor did he have any negative reputation when he first had dealings with Obama. He was a climber for sure though. He is not nor has not been an "inner circle" member for Obama. Nor have Ayers and Obama had any relationship that differs in form or substance than Ayers and anyone else at U of C, the Board on which he serves, or foundations that he has contributed to. Forget the smears by association tactic (which you are repeating ad naueum on every page). Other writers have asked you to name exactly which of Obama's proposed policies/announced positions you have issue with and why that is the case so we can try to understand your fear of his candidacy, or your love of McCain's and your confessed conversion away from the Democratic party because of said positions. Pretty tough personal stuff that Axelrod has had to endure, one after the other.

- ericad

October 21, 2008 at 1:58pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Susan K. If you don't like dirty politics, don't watch the national election. But if you are going to complain, at least complain uniformly, so we can take you seriously. McCain is not being done in by a man whose inner circle you are woefully misinformed about, but by a man whose inner circle is/was woefully in charge of this country. Rumsfeld, Cheney, Libby... If you somehow believe Obama's inner circle consists of Rezko and Ayers, why don't you just join the absurdly out-of-touch chorus of people who think Obama is a lying, conniving terrorist who took his oath of office on a Koran? Listen to yourself. Some of why McCain is losing relates to McCain's negative campaign, some of it is certainly the press' over-reporting of only the negative aspects and little-to-none of the benefits, but the majority of it is that the country is just plain sick of the GOP and the Bush legacy, whether or not McCain's claims to be a change are valid or not.

- Terry R.

October 21, 2008 at 2:41pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"It's a formula Axelrod developed working on a series of black mayoral candidates' campaigns in cities such as Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. Once Obama finally won him over, in 2002, Axelrod used it to elect Obama to the U.S. Senate" Of course, his opponent was a right-wing black loonbag shipped in to replace a more credible candidate--well,credible until his kinky divorce papers were released. I consider Hillary Clinton to be the first person Obama ever beat in an election.

- chris

October 21, 2008 at 2:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Gosh, an angry post by Susan K., just like the angry post on E. J. Dionne's piece last week. Funny you should suggest that Ayers was in the "inner circle" of Obama (no, not his inner circle. Why can't you even acnowledge that the whole PUMA thing is dead and your rage is misdirected?

- timteeter

October 21, 2008 at 3:31pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I am also wary of the deal makers, the powerful people behind the individual seeking high office. To this day I have never read anything nice about Karl Rove. But Axelrod has a good persona on TV. He hesitates a lot going head to head against Republicans on cable news. But this seems to ingratiate him to me, at least. This article is very illuminating--an insight into the real Obama. Obama really does not like negative campaigning, It could easily be said that Obama is the right man, in the right place, in the right party, with the right message at the right time, just like his senatorial race in Illinois when the Republicans fell apart. Axelrod may have something to do with at least some of these "rights." However you look at this, Axelrod is coming across as a political genius for even seeing the potential in the man with the funny name. But Obama saw the potential in Axelrod. Again, this was a very well sritten and researched article.

- Dick Day

October 21, 2008 at 4:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

To summarize: Axelrod elects pretty far-left black liberals by presenting them as attractive people, not being forthright about their policy stands which he knows would not attract enough support to form a majority, and playing on white guilt ("you can expiate the sin of racism by voting for this guy"). He viciously accuses perfectly fine people of racism (Bill Clintonm, fergawdsake!), leaving many people in teh electorate and teh political class embittered toward the new Mayor/Governor/President. Once elected, they have trouble governing. Well, d'oh!! Maybe there's a connection with how they win the office and the fact that they have no real policy mandate. Other than Axelrod, himself, and the candidates he serves, it's hard to see who gains from this. Certainly not the people or governmental entities involved. Axelrod may be very much in demand as a political strategist, but it strikes me that the country and maybe liberalism as a movement are the worse for his being there.

- Marty

October 21, 2008 at 4:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you for an informative piece on David Axelrod, about whom I knew nothing. As for the RNC troll, is that the best you've got? Really?? Go back and read the article again, and meet a REAL member of Obama's inner circle.

- Dave T

October 21, 2008 at 4:38pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It isn't always easy to 'see' a winner. It appears that Chicago politics was the way to go. Obama was in the right place at the right time. I think that has more to do with it than anything. Obama was a gift to the country from 'W.' No one else could have made it easier.

- Mike

October 21, 2008 at 4:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Something I find interesting is that so many allude to the idea that Obama has pointedly accused someone of being racist, yet the media has NEVER reported as much (and there isn't much they don't report -- otherwise you would have to hear it firsthand). That said, I would use the word "Obama's campaign," "followers," or something akin to that to express that idea. It is, after all, possible for some candidates to remain above saying certain things themselves. Even still, I have little (really NO) sympathy for ANYTHING that a Democrat does or says that is neither unethical, immoral, or illegal because no one knows better than black people the lengths that Republicans have gone to win! Not only have they said or done practically anything (including invoking race a la the senate race with Harold Ford with the white girl ad in Tennessee), but even STILL they maintain an ace in the hole! There IS no such thing as voter intimidation among Democrats --they are the ones that ARE intimidated. That is a practice that has persisted to this very day and the reason the Voter Rights Act has remained in place since it was first enacted.

- michael

October 21, 2008 at 4:50pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Can someone please talk about the Jewishness of all these people? Not in a nutty/conspiratorial fashion, but in a measured, Charles Murray / Steven Pinker fashion. It seems like an interesting topic. Plus Patrick and "no black politician"... at least mention Barbara Walters' paramour Edward Brooke!

- JasonM

October 21, 2008 at 4:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Susan K> Hillary and Bilol Clinton "have done so much for civikl rights"? What exactly? Going to black churches, dispensing greasy words don't count!

- Mandy

October 21, 2008 at 5:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Gushing? That's basically a hit piece, Susan.

-

October 21, 2008 at 5:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Change "conquer" to "exploit" and you'd have something.

- Charles

October 21, 2008 at 5:53pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The attack on Clinton was a counterpunch after Bill had put Obama's victory in SC in the same league as Jesse Jackson. Suggestomg racism wouldn't have worked if Bill hadn't tried to throw a haymaker. And Obama didn't have to say anything about Palin. I have at least 3 women friends who began working for Obama (and they still are) after the Palin nomination. The article shows very clearly how you can take a swing at Obama, but when you do, you leave yourself open for the counter.

- Malcolm

October 21, 2008 at 6:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

PS I thought the article was good; reminded me of the pieces that came out after the Clinton election. I'm sure a great book and movie will come out about this campaign, too.

- Malcolm

October 21, 2008 at 6:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How shallow. But I remain interested in some probing analysis as to how Axelrod managed to transcend his own communist upbringing to live the high life of courtside NBA tickets and obscene campaign spending.

- Bruce in Kentucky

October 21, 2008 at 7:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yes he came name his own price but he didn't do it alone, the entirety of the media has worked as hard in electing Obama as he has, then you have the Republicans who helped with the framing the left used to destroy Clinton plus all their money, work and votes in the primary to get the weakest dem candidate to run against (who knew the economy would tank and allow Obama to win) and don't forget the party establishment who went to great lengths to select him over the will of the voters and even changed the rules and stole votes and delegates and turned a blind eye to all the fraud and destruction of their own and then the mindless zombies who feel good being in the in crowd, there were a lot more forces at work than just Axelrod. But yes, the dirtiest, shrewdest ever with a bright future, much brighter than Karl, Axelrod showed him what dirty really is.

- Patty

October 21, 2008 at 7:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yes warntnr and the great exploitation of race and how he has set race relations back generations in doing so will allow him to name his price.

- TJ

October 21, 2008 at 7:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Oh, thank God for Susan K in NYC! And thank God for the internet, so ordinary people with cursory knowledge know just as much as elitist mainstream media reporters with their 'research' and 'fact checking.' Yes, Susan K is right. And actually, we are soon to see a flood of blacks win elections. You see, all a black person has to do is show up. And no one can criticize them. Cuz that would be racist. And all the main stream elites just give all black people a free pass. You see, we readers of TNR are paying attention! So why go on and on about these trivialities about Axelrod and Obama? All that matters is that a black person can do anything they want in America, and we can't stop them. And they want our white women. What's worse, our white women want them! OMG!

- Yoshi

October 21, 2008 at 7:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Very interesting article. Axelrod is a genius. He clearly prepared a perfect campaign. Who would have guessed that HRC would be beaten when it was "her turn". What a wonderfull campaign. not a single mistake. Congratulation to Axelrod and of course to Obama. We need those guys. I to everybody

- Philou69

October 21, 2008 at 8:08pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

What Axelrod did to the Clintons will mar his reputation forever. He learned well from the Rove years. Axerlod ran the campaign, who will run the White House?

- Stellaa

October 21, 2008 at 8:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Axelrod is a race baiter, and he specializes in it. That's how Philly got stuck with John Street, how Mass. got stuck with Deval Patrick, and how the democrats got stuck with obama as their nominee. All those people's opponents were victims of Axelrod, the race baiting pig. All of them had the race card played on them, and none of them deserved it. Perhaps you should write about that.

- indievoter

October 21, 2008 at 9:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I guess you also need a little luck like the US economy undergoing a September meltdown just as McCain had edged in front.

- darryl

October 21, 2008 at 9:28pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

When I went to Iowas for 8 days of get-out-the-vote canvassing last December,I asked a 60-ish looking woman if she'd made up her mind. "I think I'll vote for Barack Obama," she said, "He seems like such a nice young man." Obama won the hearts of Iowans with his 'every mother's son' persona - sincere, respectful, intelligent. In one 200 person gathering , 44 came in and only two left uncommitted. To hear Obama up front and personal - or even in stadium crowds - was to know him. It was that persona his opposition had to destroy to win. The genious of this campaign has been the strategy. Obama reacts to attack with strategy. Andrew Sullivan wrote about it in terms of Wile E. Cyote and Road Runner. This is unseen in politics where in-fighting and personality pull against coherency. On the brink of victory, Obama has come full circle, due to the unfurling of the Axelron/Obama strategy in real time. His favorable ratings and identity with ordinary voters are at a high. He has gone from militant black nationalist, to waffler, to two-faced on campaign finance and FISA, through to Ayers and 'palling arond with terrorist' and right back to 'every mother's son.' How the campaign and Obama in particular, had the discipline to stick to the script despite everyone from Democratic Party chiefs to the guy who threatened to to cancel his automatic $25/month contribution telling him to get more agressive is remarkable. For those of us in public affairs or politics, it's like watching the ballet of ballets.

- CAMtwo

October 21, 2008 at 9:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Susan K, Wwhat exactly DID the Clintons do for civil rights? All I recall from the eight years Clinton was in office is Lani Gunier, Rockefeller Drug Laws, Welfare Reform (without any real support for programs that economically empower the working poor), lax illegal immigration laws and regular increases in HB1 visas that allowed employers to supplant low wage (often black) domestic workers with even lower wage immigrant workers; inequitable treatment between Haitian and Cuban illegal immigrants; and an unwillingness to truly address social and economic inequities in the Deep South (where the majority of blacks live) because they didn't want to lose votes white Southern votes. Additionally, more black people went to jail under the Clinton administration than Bush or Reagan, and Nixon did more for blacks than Clinton ever did (most of the civil rights programs we have today were created under Nixon). These are the reasons why the majority of college-educated Generation X blacks came out early for Barack (and not "Billary") and how they were able to eventually pull their parents with them.

- Tessa J

October 22, 2008 at 12:43pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank You Tessa. That is exactly what happened. My parents, aunts, uncles and grandparents were for Clinton. I spent a whole year trying to pull them to support Barack. Unlike them, I had/have no emotional attachment to the Clintons because I have learned enough (esp. as an undergrad) that the Clintons' relationship with the African American community is a facade.

- Rhonda

October 22, 2008 at 5:25pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Susan K: No one needed to tell voters what Bill Clinton meant when he made those unfortunate remarks -- they were insinuations that Bill Clinton knew very well would convey a particular message to the good old boy voters in the south who he happened to be courting at the time. It's no accident that the remarks were not made while he was stumping for Hillary in other, less racially "sensitive", parts of the country. He knew his demographic and he exploited it in typically calculated fashion. Furthermore, Hillary ran a bad, bad, bad campaign, and toward the end resorted to throwing not only the kitchen sink, but the fridge, oven, and dishwasher at Obama, much like the McCain Campaign has been doing in the past month (and longer). Not only did she claim that McCain was better qualified to be Commander in Chief (the first time I have ever seen anything even remotely like it during the past 30 years I have been following politics), run the infamous "3 a.m" ad featuring a cameo appearance by Osama Bin Laden, imply that Barack was Muslim on national television when she knew very well that he wasn't, and dispatched surrogates (Jim Johnson and Mark Penn) to accuse Obama of being a drug dealer. The people of Amercia said "Enough!" to Hillary and they are saying the same thing now to McCain/Palin. Barack Obama has run the most disciplined and brilliant campaign this country has ever seen, and he is indeed a transformational candidate. And that is why he will be our next president. And not a moment too soon.

- Carter

October 24, 2008 at 10:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Ah, so I know who replaces Rove now, thank you! Wonder if he has a plan of attack for the growing number of people who are so sick of hearing accusations of (non-existent) racism that we are becoming inured to that particular choke chain. I have never been racist, just as some men have never been sexist. If it's possible to assume the best of men regarding sexism, then it's completely idiotic to assume the worst of white people with regard to racism. My preference for white cats was considered "racist" by a black person today! That's how DUMB these people are, always assuming everything is a "code" for something else...

- Emma

October 31, 2008 at 1:18am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close