JONATHAN COHN MAY 27, 2011
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

You hear a lot about state officials trying to fight the Affordable Care Act, whether by challenging it in the federal courts or refusing to implement its provisions. But plenty of states officials are enthusiastic about the law. And perhaps none are moving as quickly, or effectively, to follow through on the law as Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley.
Sarah Kliff has the story in Politico Pro (subscription required):
Maryland has, in some ways, flown under the radar on implementing the Affordable Care Act. It has always been a leader but hasn't racked up any first-in-the-nation accomplishments. It was the third to pass legislation enabling a health exchange, the second to set up an exchange board and one of six states participating in HHS's Early Innovator grant program, for states leading the way on exchange information technology.
But don't count Maryland out - the state has quietly begun moving at a breakneck pace to lay the foundation for a health exchange, movement that has caught the attention of the Obama administration. ...
Gov. Martin O'Malley signed the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange into law in late April and, just a month later, filled out its board with six-appointments, announced here Thursday morning.
The board will host its first meeting June 3 and follow with a second meeting later in the month. The state also plans to apply for additional funding, in the form of a health exchange establishment grant, by the end of the month.
"This is not an announcement and pause for the next step event," Joshua Sharfstein, director of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, said Thursday. "It's an announcement and we're meeting next week. There are places in the country that are not quite amenable to that, but that's not what we're dealing with in Maryland."
In retrospect, Maryland was an obvious candidate to move aggressively on health care reform. It has the right political profile, repeatedly electing liberal officials to both statewide and national office. And it has a history of health care innovation. Its system for regulating hospital prices has gotten a lot of praise from experts who believe it has held down costs without reducing quality or access.
Still, it helps to have the right people in the right place. O'Malley, who is chairman of the Democratic Governor's Association, is a star on the rise. Anthony Brown, the lieutenant governor, has made health care reform something of a personal crusade, giving a series of well-received speeches about it. Sharfstein, the new secretary of health, was deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and, before that, an advisor to Congressman Henry Waxman. (Note: Sharfstein is also an old personal friend.)
Of course, other states are moving forward on health care reform. Among them is California, which I visited earlier this month and about which I will be writing shortly. It's a good case study in what can happen when state officials work with the law rather than against it, although it's also a reminder of just how challenging implementation is even for officials who want reform to work--whether they be in California, Maryland, or any other state. Stay tuned.
Note: Speaking of states working on health care reform, the governor of Vermont just signed a single-payer plan into law. Actually, it's not exactly a single-payer plan, but it's still a really interesting idea. I'll write about that, too, when I get the chance. Yes, there's too much news happening right now--and I'm too slow to write about it all.
6 comments
Uh oh. Health care reform creep. Unfortunately, I can already see Fox making hay of this.
- chaitless
May 27, 2011 at 11:00am
I am having my sabbatical year soon so I sent my wife and kids to the states, she is an LPN and quickly found a part time full time job, that is she got hired part time (weekends) but works 40 hours a week at nursing homes, picking up week days (sometimes more) without any benefits. MY IMSS is not valid in the states so we got our kids insurance but the cost of housing, utilities, etc. means we simply have no money left over for her. I find it ironic she devotes her life to taking care of fully insured (for now) elderly people but has nothing now. When I get back soon I can use my sabbatical money from here to buy us insurance since I won't have to pay for my place here. And hopefully I can find a job with benefits myself, I have a year to do so. And Republicans have no solution. In fact they want to have all LPN's be like my wife as it will save on Medicare costs providing no benefits to LPNs, and then when LPNs say they have no benefits Republicans will blame them for not having them and they should work at places that offer them...I guess. I truly fucking hate them. The nursing homes themselves don't have much choice since they are pressured to cut costs where ever possible and not offering benefits saves a lot of money. And who the hell can afford being raped by insurance companies buying something that my wife will likely not use? Anyway, it is either eat or send money to the insurance company.
- blackton
May 27, 2011 at 11:01am
The new Republican mantra on the Ryan plan is "At least we HAVE a plan! The Democrats don't even HAVE a plan!" Which is odd, because the Democratic plan IS the ACA, and people ARE moving forward on it.
- AllanL5
May 27, 2011 at 11:05am
The new Republican mantra on the Ryan plan is "At least we HAVE a plan! The Democrats don't even HAVE a plan!" Which is odd, because the Democratic plan IS the ACA, and people ARE moving forward on it.
- AllanL5
May 27, 2011 at 11:05am
Blackton, why not spend your sabbatical year in Canada? I'll put in a good word for you and yours if need be.
- basman
May 28, 2011 at 12:08pm
Blackton, that's one of the failures of the "Service Sector" which I often rail against. The Republicans are nonchalant and confident about how the Service Sector will provide good jobs for all the manufacturing jobs America has been losing the last 2 decades. But the existential reality is precisely what your wife is experiencing; in addition to the additional downward force on salaries to minimize the greatest cost to companies that provide "services" (labor) employers like to use part-time workers to avoid having to offer benefits, as well as continually recycle employees to avoid having to pay anyone too much for their years of experience. And I refuse to believe that Republicans aren't generally aware of this dynamic of the service sector, which leaves me in the position of thinking very little of their intentions for America and its citizens (besides themselves and their friends, of course).
- GSpinks
May 30, 2011 at 11:21am