SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home In Ohio, A Showdown Over Whether to “Accommodate the...

PLANK AUGUST 20, 2012

In Ohio, A Showdown Over Whether to “Accommodate the Urban—Read African-American—Voter-Turnout Machine”

While the political world focused over the weekend on Paul Ryan’s mom, Todd Akin’s weird science and drunken, buck-naked Republican congressmen in the Sea of Galilee, a showdown over voting rights was unfolding in Ohio. And in the middle of it came another flash of what Republicans seem unable to suppress these days—accidental candor over their political objectives in seeking to restrain voter access to the polls.

There are several battles underway over voting in the Buckeye State, where Barack Obama has, remarkably, been clinging to a slight lead barely smaller than his four point edge in the state in 2008, but where any drop-off in Democratic base turnout would severely hurt him. One battle concerns the state’s tough new rules regarding “provisional ballots,” ballots that are considered to have some flaw and can only be counted after deliberation following the election. The new rules decree, for one thing, that if ballots were cast in the wrong precinct, an easy mistake to make at polling places that often include several precincts—then the ballots will not count, even if an election worker caused the mistake.

Then there are two separate battles over early voting. One concerns the weekend just prior to the election when, as it now stands, only members of the military are allowed to vote in person at polling stations. The Obama campaign has filed a lawsuit arguing that this early voting should be open to all, not just members of the military. For this, it has been branded as anti-military—Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus famously declared that the lawsuit was seeking to “water down” the military’s early-voting privilege.

The latest fight concerns early voting in the weeks prior to the final weekend. Ohio law calls for plentiful early voting opportunities in these weeks, but leaves it up to county election boards to set the hours. Democratic election officials are in favor of setting hours as expansively as possible, especially on the weekends and weekday evenings, to make it easier for working people with fixed schedules to make it to the polls (and, yes, to make easier initiatives like “souls to polls,” when voters are bused from church to voting stations after Sunday services.) Republican election officials have tended to be in favor of expansive hours in Republican-leaning counties, but have been dead set against them in urban counties that lean heavily Democratic. In most of the cities, the election boards have deadlocked along partisan lines, which kicked the decision to the Republican Secretary of State, Jon Husted, who sided with the Republican officials in limiting urban voting hours. This caused a furor, as it meant that there would be broader voting access in Republican counties than Democratic ones. In response, Husted decreed last week that there would be no weekend voting, period—a seemingly Solomonic decision that of course hit much harder in the Democratic-leaning cities where early voting is so heavily utilized. An estimated 200,000 people voted in 2008 in the hours that have now been eliminated.

Which brings us to the showdown. In protest of Husted’s decision, the two Democratic members of the Montgomery County elections board (in Dayton) voted late last week to proceed with early weekend voting, in contravention of his order. Husted told them that they were risking serious reprisal for doing so; their fate will be decided at a hearing today in Columbus.

Meanwhile, via yesterday's Columbus Dispatch came an impressively honest acknowledgment of what's behind the whole fight, from Doug Preisse, chairman of the Franklin County Republican Party (in Columbus) and a member of that county’s elections board. “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban— read African-American —voter-turnout machine,” Preisse said. “Let’s be fair and reasonable.”

Yes, let’s.

*Update, 6 p.m. Monday: A hearing officer has yet to issue his ruling on the fate of the two Montgomery County election board members, Dennis Lieberman and Tom Ritchie, Sr. They remain under suspension for having contravened Husted's early voting order. The Dayton Daily News has a good wrap on where things now stand.

follow me on Twitter @AlecMacGillis

 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 10 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

10 comments

Rachel Maddow deserves some credit for her first focusing on the Ohio voting controversy and John Stewart picked it up last Thursday on the "Daily Show". Meanwhile the smug John Fund has authored a book featuring a study about about felons voting in Minnesota to elect Al Franken, which appears to be an unsubstantiated claim: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/right-wing-howls-felons-put-franken-over-the-top-um-not-really.php

- Nusholtz

August 20, 2012 at 11:39am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Good for Dayton Democrats! They're "risking serious reprisal," eh? Yes, see about reprimanding, firing, or imprisoning some state employees for making it possible for citizens to vote in defiance of a blatantly illegal order. That's a court battle Republicans should be hankering for, right? How on Earth can different standards for who can vote when (or at all!) based on what county you're in not itself be a Fourteenth Amendment violation?

- janus

August 20, 2012 at 12:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thank you for picking this up. This is appalling.

- Sophia

August 20, 2012 at 12:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

How? Because it's not just good politics, it's great politics. Using the democratic process to eliminate actual democracy while maintaining the veneer. Kind of genius, in an evil-genius sort of way.

- GSpinks

August 20, 2012 at 1:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's all so Orwellian--expanding weekend voting to include all voters makes you "anti" one particular group, and making sure everyone is able to vote is "accommodat[ing] the urban— read African-American —voter-turnout machine"--because heaven forbid we should have high voter turnout in an election. How far we have come from the days when people worked hard, even risked their lives, to make sure that African-Americans could vote and Republicans supported them. It is infuriating and distressing to this child of the 60s.

- VAliberal

August 20, 2012 at 2:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

These latest voting-rights-restricting laws the GOP is hell-bent on passing makes me realize that we are slowly moving towards a truly one-party system by electoral fiat. 'You can vote for whomever you want as long as you vote for the GOP'. We're fast approaching the rigged elections in autocratic/plutocratic regimes of Africa and the Middle East where the GOP candidate gets 120% of the votes.

- singlspeed

August 20, 2012 at 4:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Next thing, they'll be arguing that women don't need to actually vote -- their husbands and brothers represent them fully when they cast their ballots.

- ironyroad

August 20, 2012 at 5:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Irony... In some states, husband and brother are the same person.

- singlspeed

August 20, 2012 at 6:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Now, now . . . :)

- ironyroad

August 20, 2012 at 8:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"In some states, husband and brother are the same person." How true, singlespeed. I grew up in a southern-white neighborhood in Flint, MI, and our next-door neighbors were from the mountains in Paragould, Arkansas. If that particular family was on "Who's Your Daddy," there'd be a lot of in-family sorting out to do. On the other hand, my two best friends in high school, who lived in another neighborhood and who didn't come from families like the one next door, were also from Paragould. Go figure. This voter suppression also reminds me of Putin's last election in Russia. It was fixed by using just these sorts of tactics. The GOP wants an authoritarian state, with themselves as the authorities. I've got news for GOP voters--they ain't gonna like it when it gets here. "How? Because it's not just good politics, it's great politics. Using the democratic process to eliminate actual democracy while maintaining the veneer. Kind of genius, in an evil-genius sort of way." Great comment, GSpinks. Go, Mountaineers!

- magboy47.

August 20, 2012 at 8:36pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close