The Treatment

Blue Dogs And Blue Cross, Sitting In A Tree

By

David Rogers at Politico has a terrific, highly disturbing piece on the concessions Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman made in order to win support from four Blue Dog congressmen--four votes he needs in order to get the bill out of committee. I've written that the concessions--slightly lower subsidies to help people buy insurance, along with less pricing power for the public plan--seemed modest, at least based on what's known so far. But Rogers has more details--and they are not exactly comforting:

The impact is real. For a family of four earning from $77,000 to
$88,000, the new language from the House Energy and Commerce Committee
could require an additional $770 a year--or three-quarters of Obama’s
“Making Work Pay” tax credit. For those closer to the poverty line,
such as a family of four earning $44,000 to $55,000, the relative
impact would be even greater. 

Reducing the subsidies would help scale back the cost of the plan by
almost $60 billion over 10 years a major goal for the Blue Dogs. But
Congressional Budget Office estimates show that most--if not all--of
these savings are effectively given away by the same moderates under
pressure from local hospitals and Blue Cross-Blue Shield plans to blunt
the public plan option. 

The government-backed plans now would be required to negotiate prices
with providers such as hospitals rather than to build on the existing,
lower-cost Medicare payment system. CBO had predicted that a public
option could provide coverage, on average, about 10 percent cheaper
than private alternatives. But much of this savings would now be
sacrificed, making it harder to compete against private plans such as
Blue Cross-Blue Shield. 

Loading Related Articles...
Politics
Article Tools
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.