SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home 'Silence is Suicide!'

POLITICS FEBRUARY 23, 2009

'Silence is Suicide!'

Sacramento, California

A 12-foot inflatable ATM machine sat outside the Sacramento Hyatt this past weekend, emblazoned with the words “California Taxpayers--Already Taxed To The Max!” The display was one of many illustrations of the anger of delegates here at the California Republican Convention, which met just days after a handful of Republicans in the state legislature broke party ranks to vote for a budget that included $12 billion in new taxes. Facing a $42-billion deficit and unable to carry any debt over to next year due to California’s balanced-budget requirement, the legislature conducted agonizing negotiations for months past its official deadline; breaking even without some kind of tax increases, it became clear, would have required drastic cuts to government programs. But activists at the convention didn’t want to hear any excuses. “We need to send a message,” said Mike Gomez, Solano County GOP chairman. “When you violate our core principles, you’re going to have a problem.”

Jon Fleischman, the southern vice-chair of the state party and publisher of the popular conservative blog Flashreport.com, spent the convention shepherding through a resolution to punish the GOP Judases. “At the end of the day, the party needs to be able to enforce discipline, or everybody just does what they want,” he told me, hurrying through the Hyatt lobby between meetings. Fleischman’s resolution began as just a censure, but by Sunday had turned into a pledge to withhold party re-election funds and support from the legislators who voted for the budget. Like their brethren at the national level, California Republicans are clinging to ideological purity now that they’re stranded in the political wilderness. And the budget crisis in California has only stoked their fury, posing problems for Republican candidates who need to maintain a moderate image for statewide office, and foreshadowing the direction of the national party.

It’s a dangerous time to seek leadership in the party. Just days before the convention, Senate Republicans staged a mutiny against Senate Minority Leader Dave Cogdill, ousting him from the position after he helped negotiate the budget compromise. Even Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has not been able to escape scorn for his part in pressing for the deal. He’s “probably the worst thing that’s ever happened to the California Republican party,” said Tim Hudson, the newly elected northern vice-chair, who sported a “TEA PARTY II” sticker on his lapel. Fleischman said that waiting for Schwarzenegger’s term to end is like “passing a kidney stone.” (The Governator, for his part, skipped the convention to meet with Obama in Washington.) Party elders are doing what they can to temper the rage, but to little avail. After Fleischman’s resolution passed on Sunday, an audience member stormed onto the stage and pulled back the curtains to reveal a sign that read, “THE SIX LOSERS,” displaying the names of the disgraced legislators. Party Chairman Ron Nehring scrambled to his feet to cover it up as the audience cackled and applauded.

The grassroots rage seems unconcerned with the actual challenges involved in the budget negotiations. The general fund over which the legislature has discretionary authority totals around $100 billion, meaning members would have had to immediately eliminate 40 percent of spending to avoid tax increases. Was this possible? “I always submitted that there was a way,” Republican State Senator Tom Harman told me just before addressing a lunchtime audience. “But there was never any serious discussion of that.” Others simply wanted to push the economic crisis to the brink as a test of political will. “I’d kind of liked to see how far it would have gone,” said Paul Smith, a former Congressional candidate from the Sacramento area.

This is not the party Meg Whitman wants to inherit. The former eBay CEO and McCain surrogate recently announced plans to enter the 2010 gubernatorial primary, squaring off against State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner. Both are pro-business, social moderates from Silicon Valley, and both are struggling to reassure the party. “I’m going to have my rubber boots on” this weekend to avoid the mud, one Whitman adviser told me before the convention. Pranksters at the convention ridiculed Whitman as “Arnold in a skirt” and “Ms. Potato Head Governor”--a reference to her tenure marketing the toy early in her career--with costumes to boot. She has found herself having to defend her past contributions to Democrats, her failure to register as a Republican until a year ago, and even her failing to vote in past elections (which she apologized for during a lunchtime speech this weekend). Poizner has been trying to explain away hefty donations to Al Gore and John Kerry by claiming they were his wife’s but were issued from a joint bank account in his name. The combative response they both received at the convention does not bode well for the party’s willingness to choose a moderate gubernatorial candidate that has any chance of winning a statewide election.

A few brave souls are calling for moderation. Linda Halderman, a policy advisor to State Senate Republicans and a delegate to the convention, pleaded with the resolutions committee to table the punitive measure. Most Republican legislators, she argued, knew somebody had to vote yes, and the resolution would merely “scapegoat people who simply had the balls to do it publicly, who didn’t take cover by voting no and behind closed doors saying, ‘C’mon Roger, you go up,’” she told the committee. Delegate Paul Green had a better idea: Punish them too. “We need to know … we’re not leaving anybody out of this who was complicit,” he said. Unsurprisingly, the resolution easily passed the committee.

Like the national party, California Republicans are finding it easier to hunker down in their ideological bunkers than reach cross the aisle. The trend is making it harder for any moderate Republicans in California to work with Democrats--and the more cohesive conservatives become, the more strongly they react to betrayal. State Senator Abel Maldonado--who even got Democrats to agree to place an open-primary referendum on the ballot in exchange for his vote--faced opponents at the conference gathering support for a special election to remove him from office. Speakers like Congressman Darrell Issa took open shots at him, and Fleischman called him out by name in front of a crowd of delegates. But Maldonado knew there was no other option. “Republicans couldn’t come up with $42 billion worth of cuts,” he said. “Nobody wants to decimate public education, decimate healthcare, decimate the environment, decimate transportation.” But Maldonado also knows the party doesn’t care for his reasoning anymore. As I spoke with him, he’d just emerged from a banquet hall in which he’d listened to Congressman Tom McClintock excoriate him and his cohorts before the whole assembly. “To consent to [their] actions by silence is suicide!” McClintock exclaimed. “The question I’ll leave you all with is, what are you going to do about it?” If the increasing radicalization of California’s Republicans is any indication, it’s a question that GOPers across the country will be struggling to answer for years to come.

Eric Zimmermann is a writer based in Sacramento.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 12 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

12 comments

The Republican Party may be, as Nate Silver thinks, in its Death Spiral. As it alienates more and more independents and moderates, it becomes increasingly dominated by its right-wing radicals, which in turn alienates more moderates and independents, and so on. If so, it is a well deserved death. The damage the radical right has inflicted on America is massive, and the right-wing political movement needs to collapse.

- J. Miller

February 24, 2009 at 1:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"ATM machine" is redundant--the equivalent of saying automated teller machine machine.

- Jenn Fields

February 24, 2009 at 12:03pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

California has engaged in an orgy of spending. They should try repealing all spending increases passed in the last 10 years. That would go a long ways toward reducing their budget problems. But that would require compromise by Democrats. That never happens.

- JohnB

February 24, 2009 at 12:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

It's amazing really. What about the last four years makes GOP true believers think that their economic policies and anti-tax mantra work, either politically or economically? One group of Americans want to solve the problems we face, in a bipartisan way if possible. Another group wants to chant its simple ideology in the face of these new, comlex and threatening problems. And then those same Republican zealots want to punish free-r thinkers and actors in their party who decide to act responsibly, and vote for compromise. Nothing about the GOP is digestible to the vast majority of the American public; and yet, they don't seem to understand that. As the kids say - LOL LOL LOL LOL !!

- DGrim

February 24, 2009 at 1:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Yes, California is basically ungovernable, and the ballot proposition system here that's causing the trouble is seriously screwed up. The only way to fix these things is to make the budget process a bare majority process, which is how it's done federally. Senators can't even filibuster the bill because it's too important, as well as an overhaul of the proposition system. This is how it has to be done, and I suspect that we'll see action toward this soon. This would be good--I'm tired of California being the joke state when it comes to governance. But thanks for this article. California Republicans really are a breed apart, and it's been amusing to watch America's politics come more and more to resemble California's, with a large Democratic majority that is fairly diverse and a small rump of extreme Republicans just large enough to cause trouble, and who are obsessed with dogma above all else. As goes California, so goes the nation.

- lev

February 24, 2009 at 1:44pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

John B, if you think this is a good time for any government to be reducing social welfare expenditures you would be unique.

- Gaston

February 24, 2009 at 4:14pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Those of us whose jobs depend on the California state budget have watched this whole drama unfold with complete incredulity. The Republicans never came to the table with anything substantive, because they know that doing so would eventually cause their complete political downfall: severe budget cuts would severely damage most Republican districts, since they are some of our poorest. Once you start saying where you want to cut, you open yourself up to attack. At a time when what we need is people dedicated to good governance, we get just enough people dedicated to their own privileged sense of outrage.

- James F. Elliott

February 24, 2009 at 4:27pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

California, like most one-party states, is totally corrupt. The public worker unions bribe the reigning Democrats to increase their salaries and perks. Democrats use their contributions, in cash and kind, to keep dominant. The small Republican minority tries to speak for the overburdened taxpayer, but some are too weak or immoral. Does any of this sound familiar to you New Yorkers ?

- lenw9

February 24, 2009 at 5:57pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

JohnB: What a terrific idea! Repeal all spending increases over the last ten years. A perfect summation of the Republican mindset. Then you could go on to repeal all population growth over the last ten years, followed by repeal of all air pollution, earthquakes, fires, floods, droughts and criminal acts that have taken place over the last ten years. Do you people even stop to listen to yourselves?

- ChaimR

February 24, 2009 at 6:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I find California Republicans a particularly shrill demographic. They carry the martyr-complex that most conservatives carry but they're even more dramatic about it because they feel like they're an oppressed minority in a state full of liberal iniquity. Rarely is one party ever at solely at fault for any government breakdown, but the state GOP has a lot of explaining to do the the population of this state for holding up a budget for absolutely no good reason other than to play the spoiler. Tax increases were never in doubt and could not be avoided. But for their impassioned defense of them they got nothing to show for it. Less and less people think the "all taxes are bad" mantra holds water, and I think Republicans will be an even angrier party when they realize that fr

- shaw-man

February 24, 2009 at 7:25pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Republican's are loosing it indeed. Thank God. I say, keep it up, its good for the next eight years at the least and will keep them busy and stuck in ideological hell. RIP GOPers. Thanks, LL

- Lynda

February 24, 2009 at 8:33pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised by the grotesquely entitled comments of most of the readers here. No republican thinks all taxes are bad. Republicans submitted alternative budget proposals. California is not ungovernable; we have just elected corrupt democrats and republicans, who represent the unengaged and the unproductive. If government is the largest employer, who is paying for it but the minority? The minority of taxpayers who know our government spent beyond our means for a decade, and decides that the only solution to their spending habits is for us to work harder and take home less. I don't care which party advocates spending which matches revenue, or which party advocates keeping my employer in the state. I will support them. I guess if you're dependent on tax dollars for your income, that party is the democrats. That's not ideology, that's my rent due at the first of the month. Maybe all of you enjoy paying 40% more for government than at the start of the current administration's term, I don't personally see 40% more results. Correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe you all think that the only solution to government spending is government taxing. Taxpayers think the only solution to government spending is lowering the taxes. Maybe if we thought we were getting our money's worth, or maybe if the government didn't reach for the credit card every year knowing we'll go back to work to pay the bill. If your kids max out the credit card, do you shrug your shoulders and hand them another one, or do you cut the card and tell them to start making payments? Not angry, just tired and broke. You're welcome.

- Justin Smith

February 26, 2009 at 5:47am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close