SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home How Rick Perry–Mr. "Oops"–Helped Kill the Romney...

PLANK NOVEMBER 7, 2012

How Rick Perry–Mr. "Oops"–Helped Kill the Romney Campaign

Of all the characters who littered the strange campaign of 2012, none was a bigger laughingstock than Rick Perry, who will go down in political lore for three things: threatening bodily harm to the chairman of the Federal Reserve, declaring that our staunch ally Turkey is run by "Islamic terrorists", and, oops, I can’t remember the third thing. But now that the election is over, it’s looking like Perry had the last laugh.

It’s been so long now that it’s easy to forget, but 15 months ago, the governor of Texas was looming as a force to be reckoned with. After mulling a run for president, he decided to jump in, with a potent fundraising base and the presumptive support of most of the delegate-rich South behind him. Sure, he wasn’t considered the sharpest pitchfork in the barn, but he had never lost an election and, with his brief flirtation with secession, had tapped into the anti-Washington fervor of the moment far better than any other Republican in the field. Premier national political magazines dispatched reporters to do long profiles of him. And the frontrunner for the Republican nomination fatefully decided that Perry was such a threat to his prospects that he would … try to destroy him by running to his right on immigration.

Mitt Romney repeatedly attacked Perry for his support of in-state tuition for undocumented students at Texas colleges, declaring at one debate that it "made no sense at all" and running what was probably the nastiest ad of the primaries, a Web ad (since disappeared) that concluded with a clip of former Mexican president Vincente Fox praising Perry, as if that in and of itself was disqualifying. (Separate from the attacks on Perry, Romney also declared he would veto the Dream Act, which provides a route to citizenship for young illegal immigrants, and proposed a policy under which undocumented residents would "self-deport.") It was a brazen gambit. For one thing, Romney had had a spot of trouble some years earlier for employing illegal immigrants at his Belmont, Mass. manse, which Perry made sure to mention in what became the most heated exchange of the primary season. For another thing, it cynically overlooked the reality of Texas, where vast numbers of young undocumented residents are a reality to be reckoned with and where the tuition policy had broad legislative support. It was left to Perry to utter the defense that arguably sealed his fate even before his debate snafu: "If you say we should not educate children who come into our state … by no fault of their own, I don't think you have a heart."

But even as Romney was glorying in the move, its risks were plain to see. After vanquishing his foes amid a virtually all-white primary electorate, Romney was going to face a general election in which he could not afford to do worse than John McCain had with Hispanics—a 32 percent share. His harsh rhetoric was, for many voters, going to be inextricable with the litany of Republican callousness on the issue—Tom Tancredo, Maricopa County Sherrif Joe Arpaio, Arizona’s draconian anti-illegal immigration law and its copycats in Alabama and elsewhere, and on and on. Hispanic Republicans warned Romney to cool it, but he blustered on. What was he thinking? Probably, that he had managed so often in other contexts to play the opportunistic Etch-a-Sketch game, so why not think he could do the same here? Come general election time, he would have his son Craig tape Spanish-language ads, and would load up the Tampa convention with Hispanic Republicans, and would appear at a Univision forum with an oddly-tinted skin tone.

No dice. As the campaign went on, it became clear that Romney's immigration flanking of Perry was an "original sin," as Ron Brownstein put it. In a year when many Hispanic voters surely were gettable, out of frustration with a slow recovery and Obama’s failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform, Romney’s share of the Hispanic vote on Tuesday plunged to 27 percent—while the Hispanic share of the electorate ticked inexorably up by about a third, to 10 percent. Somewhere in West Texas, a man in cowboy boots named "Freedom" and "Liberty" was cackling.

Support thought-provoking, quality journalism. Join The New Republic for $3.99/month.

A final cautionary note on this: even as the Republicans’ woes with Hispanic voters are drawing overdue attention—even Charles Krauthammer was hitting Romney on this score after the votes came in—it is important to keep some regional context in mind. The GOP’s Hispanic deficit is a huge Electoral College problem for the party in Florida, Colorado and Nevada, and will soon become a problem in Arizona and maybe even Georgia and (dreamers can dream) Texas. But it is a negligible factor in the Democrats’ Midwestern firewall, the swath of states that guaranteed Barack Obama’s victory Tuesday night: Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota. While it’s proper for demographers to herald the Democrats’ expanding, multi-hued coalition, it is also worth remembering that Obama won Ohio because of a) huge turnout by African-Americans and b) his ability to hang onto far more working-class white voters than he did in other parts of the country—and to even pick up some more along the way. Check out this terrific New York Times map showing the shifts in party support between 2008 and this year. Not surprisingly, given Obama's narrower edge this time around, most of the country shifted red to a certain degree. But look what shifted more Democratic even than in Obama’s big 2008 win—much of central Ohio. Much of that is due to the increasingly cosmopolitan Columbus metro area. But it’s also a reflection of shifts in deeply middle- and working-class towns like Chillicothe, the seat of Ross County, where Obama somehow managed to improve substantially over his 2008 vote share. In places like this, what mattered was less Mitt Romney demagoguing Rick Perry on immigration than his blithely offering the Texas governor a $10,000 bet.

Follow me on Twitter @AlecMacGillis

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 16 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

16 comments

yep. Republicans preach that poors are lazy, olds are moochers, inheritors built everything and are job creators, the middle class is just for harvesting, and you don't count if you don't have corporate or crank big bucks. This message is increasingly color blind.

- JCAtwood

November 8, 2012 at 3:28am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Come on Alec. Gov. Perry does not "cackle". Since Obama took all the credit during his campaign for "tough" sanctions on Iran, I just want to thank Rick Perry for suggesting sanctions on Iran's Central Bank during one of the primary debates. An overwhelming bi-partisan Congress acted on that idea, and Obama/Geithner fought it for months. No one should over-interpret Ohio2012.

- K2K

November 8, 2012 at 6:42am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Another piece of good reporting. But, as I like repeating, Romney lost because Sununu was lazy (Sununu had claimed that President Obama lost the first debate because the President was lazy -- what an @ssh#ole.)

- Nusholtz

November 8, 2012 at 8:35am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

yeah, good article. I thought the same thing, I felt sorry for Perry the past two days, it must have been tiring to have to appear sad publicly while inside he must be as happy as hell. "If you say we should not educate children who come into our state … by no fault of their own, I don't think you have a heart." That was the single most decent thing I have ever heard him say. I have to admit many Republicans during the primary season surprised me with taking positions they knew had to be unpopular with the base. Perry on Hispanics, Santorum on allowing felons to vote (and explicitly black felons as a way to reintegrate them into society), Newt Gingrich with his social engineering comments. Romney, of course, never did not do the most expediently convenient thing to do..which is a big part of why I loathed him but apart from him I think I could have cobbled together a Republican who I could accept. Shame Huntsman never caught on.

- blackton

November 8, 2012 at 8:58am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

With the comparisons of 2012 to 2004, is anybody comparing Perry et. al. to Howard Dean? Just as Perry et. al. did not create sustained electoral pressure on Romney, but forced him to adopt positions to the right of the general electorate, Dean had no meaningful electoral effect on Kerry in the 2004 primary but forced him to tack to the left, notably on shifting emphasis from Bush's mismanagement of Iraq to questioning going in in the first place and opposing the funds to conduct the effort there, to his detriment in the general election.

- sighthnd

November 8, 2012 at 11:20am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"How Rick Perry–Mr. "Oops"–Helped Kill the Romney Campaign" It was Perry and his Republican friends. I wouldn't give Perry too much credit.

- arnon1

November 8, 2012 at 3:02pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I see that some Republican true believers think that they will win some day. Yes, some day, the same day the South "wiil rise" or "hell freezes over."

- arnon1

November 8, 2012 at 3:07pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

blackton, Huntsman and other rational Republicans don't have a prayer in today's GOP. Look what happened to Lugar. This better change. If they get much worse they'll be full on Fascist, with their bibles and their flags. As it is, the disbelief in factual reality and no-compromise attitudes combined with demonizing people who don't think or look like "real Americans" is pretty scary. Also, the grip on states due to gerrymandering and Citizen's United money is no joke.

- Sophia

November 8, 2012 at 3:59pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Too bad Alec never gave us any insight into how both Obama and Romney, in their debate prep, studied the Romney-hand-on-Perry debate moment. THAT will soon enough be recognized as one of the greatest moments in presidential debate history, in the body language, and how Romney lost it, "for Pete's sake". Anyway, it played out in debate #2. Obama even used the Perry arm squeezegreeting to unsettle Romney. Now that thiry states have Republican governors, and SCOTUS did change the Medicaid part of ACA (which should mean a major revision to ACA?), Governor Perry's 10th Amendment project will be interesting to watch.

- K2K

November 8, 2012 at 5:42pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Too bad Alec never gave us any insight into how both Obama and Romney, in their debate prep, studied the Romney-hand-on-Perry debate moment. THAT will soon enough be recognized as one of the greatest moments in presidential debate history, in the body language, and how Romney lost it, "for Pete's sake". Anyway, it played out in debate #2. Obama even used the Perry arm squeezegreeting to unsettle Romney. Now that thiry states have Republican governors, and SCOTUS did change the Medicaid part of ACA (which should mean a major revision to ACA?), Governor Perry's 10th Amendment project will be interesting to watch.

- K2K

November 8, 2012 at 5:46pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I believe Perry's other contribution to Romney's undoing was even more powerful, and the one the Obama campaign used as a primary assault: "vulture capitalist" played well nationwide.

- smabry03

November 9, 2012 at 6:49am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

smabry03: absolutely! Perry really got thumped by Fox and the GOP for that vulture capitalist comment. But, I think it was Sheldon Adelson's funding Newt's King of Bain video that really handed that gift to Obama. Perhaps it is more intriguing as to why Brian Sandoval, governor of Nevada, and early endorser of Rick Perry along with Bobby Jindal, why Sandoval did nothing to help Romney in Nevada. Alec MacGillis discredits himself for changing this title to be as snarky as possible. Perry's "Oops" moment was because he made the mistake of looking at Ron Paul, whose campaign was waging cyber-war against Perry. Give it a rest Alec. Lots of reasons to attack Rick Perry on issues. No need to write like a 12-year old.

- K2K

November 9, 2012 at 2:56pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A shoe that has not dropped is why Christie was acting sensible about Obama's reaction to the hurricane. What is Christie really up to? Come on TNR; I depend on your to answer these questions for me.

- skahn

November 9, 2012 at 10:25pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

K2K, it’s obvious that you still harbor unwarranted feelings for Perry, but criticizing MacGillis’ writing style is not sending any warm and fuzzy signals about your favorite failed candidate. Perry’s “oops” moment happened because he had a bad habit of saying things that he did not fully understand, not because he looked at Ron Paul, whose online supporters had been attacking all of the other primary candidates, not just Perry. The notion of shutting down three cabinet-level departments of the US government was just another tea-bagger sound-bite, and since Perry wasn’t sincere, he simply couldn’t remember which nonsense he was supposed to say at that point in the debate. It was unfortunate that at the time of his brain-fart he was standing next to Paul, who had been recommending the elimination of specific government departments for decades. By turning to Paul while ticking off his brief list, Perry seemed even dumber and more shallow when he couldn’t make it to number three.

- mam

November 10, 2012 at 12:18pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

mam: you have no idea how much Ron Paul hates Rick Perry. or how Ron Paul looked like a gargoyle at that moment. Everyone except Alec MacGillis gave Perry credit for his resilient recovery after that one moment. It is Alec who "still harbor unwarranted feelings for Perry"

- K2K

November 11, 2012 at 7:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Ron Paul has sounded fed up with nonLibertarian candidates for decades, K2K. As a Texan, he probably did have an extra dose of dislike for Perry’s shallowness and hypocrisy, especially Perry’s taking credit for economic growth that was based significantly on the receipt of federal money. But no one cared about Paul’s visage; no one except you, apparently. Mentioning this random opinion of yours is an odd way to attempt to stick up for Perry, whose “resilient recovery” (in your words) consisted of quitting the race only a couple of months after his “oops” performance.

- mam

November 13, 2012 at 12:25pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close