PLANK DECEMBER 6, 2012
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

—Revelation 9:6
Between an electoral defeat that was wholly unexpected (by them, anyway) and a “fiscal cliff” that will compel them to support a tax increase, Republicans are experiencing present political reality as a sort of Apocalypse. That's how it feels, anyway; eventually they will adjust. But for now they’re channeling their resentment into internecine warfare, creating a tableau vivant of pitched battle and unending recrimination that Hieronymus Bosch could have set against a landscape of burning lakes and whirling locusts. It is deeply satisfying to behold. But there’s so much bile flying in so many directions that the uninitiated can find it difficult to keep track of who’s purging whom, and why. Here follows a guide to some of the more interesting enmities.
John Boehner’s back-bencher purge. House Speaker John Boehner stripped four Republican members of sought-after assignments to two prominent committees (Budget and Financial Services), then warned the rest of the GOP caucus that “there may be more folks that will be targeted … we’re watching all your votes.” Boehner insists the four (Walter Jones of North Carolina, David Schweikert of Arizona, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Justin Amash of Michigan) weren’t purged for being too conservative, but rather for not being “team players.” One thing they had in common, though, was a vote against last year’s debt-ceiling deal.
Boehner’s (and Paul Ryan’s) Ryan-Plan purge. The budget plan Boehner presented to the White House—which contained $800 billion in tax increases over ten years and $1.4 trillion in spending cuts, including cuts to Social Security and Medicare—constituted, among other things, the first formal Republican acknowledgment that Paul Ryan’s House-passed budget plan is dead. Ryan himself has not been purged, however. He is participating in fiscal-cliff negotiations. Indeed, while some House conservatives say the Ryan plan will live to fight another day, there are tentative signs that Ryan himself is done with the budget proposal that brought him to national prominence. He still maintains pride of authorship, however. Amash and Huelskamp, it’s been suggested, were removed from the Budget committee at least partly on Ryan’s recommendation; they both voted against the Ryan plan this year.
Conservatives’ Boehner Purge. Purging dissidents and proposing a tax increase—even one lacking, as Boehner’s does, the tiniest detail about how revenues will be raised—has not endeared Boehner to the party’s conservative wing. GOP performance artist Sarah Palin said, “Right now the GOP establishment is more concerned about the opinion of the media and the Georgetown cocktail circuit than they are ‘we the people’ who hired them.” FreedomWorks, a Koch-funded, Tea-Party-affiliated nonprofit, is also angry at Boehner, and has called on him to reinstate the four dissenters. Another right-wing group called Americans For Majority Action has begun a campaign to dump Boehner as speaker next month; 16 abstentions would do the trick. The leading (but not, at this moment, very plausible) alternative appears to be Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who heads the Republican Study Committee and opposes a tax increase.
FreedomWorks’s Dick Armey Purge. Dick Armey, a former House majority leader, has been paid $8 million to vacate his high-profile position as chairman of FreedomWorks. Apparently Armey and FreedomWorks president Matt Kibbe can’t stand each other. The final straw came when Armey refused to sign off on a book contract Kibbe struck with HarperCollins. The book’s research and promotion relied on FreedomWorks staff, putting FreedomWorks’s tax-exempt status, Armey felt, in jeopardy. (Attention IRS: Kibbe went ahead with the deal anyway.) Sources at FreedomWorks complained to Politico that they spent so much time promoting Kibbe’s book that they didn’t have enough time to mobilize conservatives for the election. An $8 million golden parachute is pretty eye-catching for an organization that claims to work at the grass roots; as of 2010, Politico reports, Armey’s salary was a cool half-million. But if the intent was shut Armey up by shoving money down his throat, it didn’t work. “What bothered me most … was that [Kibbe] was asking me to lie, and it was a lie that I thought brought the organization in harm’s way,” Armey told Politico.
Charles Koch’s Bill Koch Purge. Actually, this one is several decades old, but Forbes has a new piece about the Koch family that mentions it. Charles Koch hates his brother Bill so much that he refuses to utter his name out loud. It all goes back to a long-ago dispute over the family business. Bill now has his own company, Oxbow Carbon, and ranks a mere 92nd on the Forbes 400 (Charles, and Bill’s twin, David, are ranked fourth).
Kirby Martensen’s Bill Koch Purge. In October, this former executive at Oxbow accused Bill Koch of kidnapping him in the course of purging him, Martensen, from Oxbow.
Fox News’s Karl Rove Purge. Fox News chairman Roger Ailes hath decreed that henceforth producers will need special permission before they can book Karl Rove or Dick Morris. The stated reason is that Ailes wants some fresher faces now that the election is over. But Rove and Morris made notably faulty election predictions on Fox, and Rove reportedly angered Ailes when he challenged Fox’s number-crunchers for calling the election for Obama.
Bill Kristol’s Grover Norquist Purge. In a Weekly Standard piece urging conservatives to support a “modified version” of Obama’s tax plan, Kristol called Norquist “our modern-day Angelo” from Measure For Measure. This was tantamount to calling Norquist a hypocrite, because in Measure For Measure Angelo, when granted temporary rule over Vienna, insists on strictly enforcing a law that makes sex outside marriage a capital offense … while at the same time propositioning the condemned man’s sister (to whom Angelo is not married). If she screws him, Angelo says, he’ll commute her brother’s sentence! Kristol may have meant only to suggest that Norquist was rigid and unforgiving in enforcing his Taxpayer Protection Pledge (more like Shylock demanding his pound of flesh in The Merchant of Venice, though given the anti-Semitism typically attributed to that play Shylock is not an allusion to be made lightly, particularly in a neoconservative magazine). The evidence that Kristol meant only that Norquist is too unforgiving is the absence of any direct argument in Kristol’s piece that Norquist is a hypocrite. But Kristol does point out (without mentioning Norquist) that it’s not remotely logical to favor a payroll-tax increase, as congressional Republicans did last year, and then insist that that isn’t a tax increase. Norquist, as it happens, rather cravenly endorsed this hypocritical formulation at the time.
Erick Erickson’s 66 Canal Center Plaza Purge. Erickson, co-founder of the right-wing blog RedState and a onetime city councilman in Macon, Ga., briefly considered, and then rejected, the idea of challenging the soft-on-taxes Georgia Republican Saxby Chambliss in the Senate primary. Instead he’s venting his rage against the fifth floor of 66 Canal Center Plaza in Alexandria, Va. On this floor reside a variety of “charlatan consultants,” all incestuously connected to the Republican National Committee, the Romney campaign, and each other, and all of which raked in ungodly quantities of cash while sending Romney to his doom. Crossroads Media is there, funded by Karl Rove’s American Crossroads; so is Restore Our Future, the pro-Romney Super PAC. They are, Erickson says, “evil.”
14 comments
. . . And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
- skahn
December 6, 2012 at 12:28am
What a pleasure to watch these posterior orifices vent on each other. It makes clear what their element is.
- phyrro
December 6, 2012 at 1:38am
What a pleasure to watch these posterior orifices vent on each other. It makes clear what their element is.
- phyrro
December 6, 2012 at 1:38am
I'm currently watching season #1 of that dark and doom-laden 1990s series Millennium on DVD. Totally fits.
- ironyroad
December 6, 2012 at 1:41am
Good reporting. Republicans should take their own advice. Cut back on donations from the wealthy and shrink.
- Nusholtz
December 6, 2012 at 6:42am
Good for John Boehner, I stand by him completely. Purge those arrogant selfish little shits, you have a country to run brother. Good on ya.
- WandreyCer
December 6, 2012 at 7:03am
Today's NYT has a front pager by Jennifer Steinhauer to the effect that the rank and file is supporting Boehner in negotiations with Obama and will approve whatever compromise plan Boehner presents to them. Of course, that's preposterous. As I read the story (and it is a "story"), I thought about how the NYT is morphing into the WP. Which made me think about the WP of the Watergate era and Woodstein. I recently watched All the President's Men and realized that the WP hasn't changed at all, and is the same newspaper it has always been. Just as Lori Montgomery (or whoever) pushes a narrative in the WP today, so did Woodstein back then. Woodstein's subject (Nixon) made the job easier because that scoundrel was guilty of most everything, but the method (pushing a narrative) is the same. Fiction is as likely to be found on the front page of the WP and the NYT as at Barnes and Noble.
- rayward
December 6, 2012 at 7:07am
This is the other side of the coin of not having a Big Tent, like the Democrats. When Republican policies get fractured, by failure or something, they have to run around trying to first identify what the dogma SHOULD be. Then they have to identify who the heretics are, then purge the heretics. And when the dogma splinters, you'll have the more conservative trying to throw the less conservative under the bus, while the less conservative have to do the same thing to the more conservative.
- AllanL5
December 6, 2012 at 9:35am
Why is it the GOP has to go through party "purges"? Why are they trapped in dogma that shackles them, keeping them from action? Quite simply, it is because they are what they rail against. A top down, ignore the people, do as we say, not as we do, political apparatus. Remarkably similar to the Soviet design. Can you imagine if they truly ran the country completely, and a life or death situation hit our country? Or what would happen to dissent? I shudder to think.
- Ricochet
December 6, 2012 at 12:31pm
Right! I was thinking, "Soviet Union." Too bad we don't have a gulag for wayward Republicans. Wait. Maybe we do - used to be run by Sarah Palin, under the very nose of Vladimir Putin! Just a thought:) But sadly - no salt mines. Maybe we could arrange some. Wouldn't it be lovely watching the plutocrats and apparatchiks working?
- Sophia
December 6, 2012 at 1:26pm
Nice piece, though I don't underestimate the potential for most of these characters to make nice again once the smoke has cleared and when they decide to make common cause against Obama and the Dems. But as long as we're talking about purges, what about purging the Republican pollsters who got it so wrong leading up to election day? If Dem pollsters had been so incompetent, many Dem leaders, party faithful and progressives would be calling for their heads. On second thought, as a progressive, I say let's leave those Republican pollsters in place for future contests...
- Thunderroad
December 6, 2012 at 2:26pm
Yes, and also key campaign strategist Stuart Stevens, who said last night on TV that the only thing that damaged Romney's end-run was Hurricane Sandy. Way to go Stuart!
- ironyroad
December 6, 2012 at 4:31pm
Ha Irony!! That Stuart guy is pristine in his own way - the perfect parody of himself and his tribe. Jon Stewart, Jimmy Kimmel, none of them could have concocted such perfect specimen, the ultimate parody of himself. Keep it coming guys!
- WandreyCer
December 6, 2012 at 5:31pm
The sad beauty of the Republican party's top echelons is that they enforce discipline. It may be a nasty thing to behold, but it keeps the soldiers in line and they all stick to their talking points. Democrats have nowhere near the party discipline. Generally this is a good thing - but there are times when a party needs to be an unstoppable object or an immovable wall.
- AB
December 6, 2012 at 9:48pm