SUBSCRIBE NOW WELCOME BACK. Do you want to continue reading where you left off? New Republic subscribers can pick up where they left off no matter which device they were previously using. SUBSCRIBE NOW

Go Home Huntsman, Interrupted

POLITICS MAY 20, 2009

Huntsman, Interrupted

Salt Lake City, Utah

Jon Huntsman Jr. wants to know if I'm in the mood for Mexican food for lunch. "I know a great place we can go downtown," the Utah governor says as we pile into the back seat of his black, tinted Suburban. (He goes there all the time, three of his aides separately assure me.) We drive south from Capitol Hill, passing the enormous Mormon temple in the center of town. The car finally turns into a Sears parking lot on the other side of the city, across the street from a pornography store that offers to "BUY AND SELL USED ADULT MAGAZINES AND DVDS."

Huntsman, shedding his jacket for a fleece that does little to hide his designer suit, jumps out of the car and runs up to a group of chaps-clad bikers on the side of the lot. "Looks like you got the Fatboy wheels, you got the Fatboy tank, a Dyna Glide engine, and some shotgun pipes on there," the governor says after mounting one. "Wanna hear them?" the owner asks. "Oh, I've heard them before," Huntsman said.

With the bikers left duly impressed, Huntsman makes his way over to the decrepit taco stand in the corner of the parking lot, offering "Hola"s and "Gracias"es to the bewildered patrons. Looking at the buckets full of brown onions and browner tomatoes left out to roast in the sun, I consider promising the governor to write about his "favorite taco stand" if we can actually eat somewhere else--but his aide is already placing an order for us.

We take a seat on the curb and try to eat the over-stuffed tortillas. "The best!" he says, wiping lettuce from his mouth. A middle-aged Hispanic man approaches us with his young son in tow and gestures to his camera phone. "Oh sure, of course, come right over," Huntsman says, plopping his plate on the sidewalk and putting his arm around the boy. The boy looks over at me and whispers in Spanish, "Is he the president?"

That’s what I came to Utah to find out--more precisely, would he be our next president? At the time, it was a reasonable question. A virtual unknown only six months ago, Huntsman had burst onto the national radar based largely on his declaration of support for civil unions in February--a shocking position for the Republican governor of the reddest state in the country. He then started using his new platform to brashly criticize his own party. Politico, which in February dubbed him "the fastest-rising star you have never heard of," by March described him as "an articulate, unapologetic, and unlikely spokesman for a new brand of Republicanism." By May, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe was describing Huntsman as "the one person in [the Republican Party] who might be a potential presidential candidate."

But it seems like Huntsman's appeal was getting to be too much for the Obama team to stomach: This past weekend, Obama nominated Huntsman to be ambassador to China--essentially undermining any chance that the young, moderate Republican would challenge him in 2012 by sending him to another continent for the next few years. Almost everyone I spoke with in the State Department and Utah politics confirms that the decision was not driven by Huntsman’s China expertise or business experience. "We all thought it was going to be [former State Department counselor] Wendy Sherman," says one source in the State Department. "Huntsman is incredibly fit for the job and will be well-received in China, but were there political motivations behind this? Everybody here thinks so."

If Huntsman was so well-positioned to be a serious contender in 2012, why would he accept a job that takes him out of the running? The story of Huntsman's meteoric rise in the GOP--and recent decision to bow out of the 2012 race--is not only a reflection of the depths to which the party has sunk, but also an indication of where it might be heading. And if Huntsman's savvy in making this decision is any indication, this is not the last we'll be seeing of him.

 

"I don't know if you've heard, but I have a thing for motorcycles," Huntsman tells me as we enter the capitol building. I couldn't help but notice. His office is a shrine to extreme sports and motocross racing, adorned with model motorcycles and photos of a mud-caked Huntsman riding a dirt bike. (A picture of the governor with George W. Bush is tucked nearly out of view on a bottom shelf.) An X-Lite helmet signed by Grand Prix winner Carl Checa sits on his windowsill, eclipsing the view of the Mormon temple down the hill.

Getting dirty and hanging out with roughnecks is certainly one way to prove that, despite being the son of one of the richest and most politically connected men in Utah, you're a regular guy. It's one half of the balancing act that defines much of Huntsman's appeal--his ability to be both an affable man-of-the-people and an urbane man-of-the-world.

After giving me a tour of his motorcycle collectibles, Huntsman is immediately joined by an aide who is helping to plan the governor's China trip for the Western Governors' Association, which Huntsman chairs. In retrospect, having watched him micromanage every detail of the trip--down to the type of translators they'll use and the specific regional governors they'll meet--I can see how his name wound up on Obama’s shortlist for the Beijing post. Huntsman served as the U.S. ambassador to Singapore under George H. W. Bush at age 32, the youngest head of an American diplomatic mission in over 100 years. His shelves are lined with dozens of books about China--ranging from China Hands to China, Inc.--and an oversized book of Chinese propaganda posters occupies much of the space on his coffee table. When the aide brings up concerns about coordinating with their Chinese counterparts, Huntsman gets the Chinese ambassador on the phone within minutes to work things out himself--in fluent Mandarin Chinese. (Huntsman learned the language while serving as a Mormon missionary in Taiwan during college.)

Hanging up the phone, Huntsman quickly ducks into a meeting with his council of economic and policy advisors, where he follows up on his office's efforts at health care reform and developing a statewide plan for energy efficiency. Huntsman, leaning back in a plush leather chair, fires off questions on the most technical aspects of these initiatives, seeming more like a CEO than a politician. It's a habit he picked up while a student at Wharton and at the helm of the Huntsman Corporation (Utah's largest company), not to mention as a deputy assistant secretary in the commerce department under George H. W. Bush and a deputy U.S. trade representative under President George W. Bush. To Huntsman, the economy should be a politician's "focus, laser-like," despite the fact that it doesn't "make for a very colorful and interesting sideshow."

Huntsman is certainly right: His skillful stewardship of the state's economy is not what propelled him onto the national stage. Huntsman, who was elected in 2004 as a fairly conventional Republican campaigning on a platform of economic development, first began breaking with his party over environmental issues--for instance, signing the bold Western Regional Climate Action Initiative. He then started taking relatively progressive stands on immigration, unions, and education. As opposed to some of the more conservative Republican governors, Huntsman accepted all the money from Obama's stimulus package offered to the state. "Limited government is important," Huntsman explains, "but I need to make sure that we have a government that actually delivers on issues that people expect us to manage competently and well."

By far his most explosive position has been his support for civil unions this year, a clear shift from his support during his 2004 campaign for Utah's constitutional gay marriage and civil union ban--which his spokeswoman says he now favors repealing. The position is particularly surprising in a state where, according to recent polls, 70 percent of people oppose civil unions. "I've always been in favor of equal rights," he says in explaining his stance. "What would Abraham Lincoln be doing if he were around today?" Huntsman says that he has little patience for the traditional "culture war" issues. "I'm not good at playing those games," he tells me. Huntsman was the only 2012 front-runner not to show at this year's Conservative Political Action Conference.

But defying all expectations, his popularity barely took a hit, sinking only from 90 to 84 percent. Emboldened, he started taking on the national party, excoriating GOP leaders for their knee-jerk obstructionism and narrow social conservatism. "I don't even know the [Republican] congressional leadership--I have not met them, I don't listen or read whatever it is they say because it is inconsequential, completely," he told The Washington Times in a scathing February interview. "Our moral soapbox was completely taken away from us because of our behavior in the last few years."

In dozens of interviews over the past few weeks, he has characterized Republicans as "devoid of ideas" and "gasping for air," decrying the GOP's "gratuitous partisanship," comparing it to "a very narrow party of angry people," and describing its strategy as "obstruct and obfuscate … grousing and complaining." When I ask him who he sees as potential leaders for the party, he says with a mischievous grin, "I don't know that we have one."

To be sure, Huntsman is no Republican In Name Only; his positions on abortion and gun control still hew quite closely to the Republican line. But he sees himself within a broader GOP tradition. "[Republicans] forget sometimes what Lincoln taught us about individual dignity and equal rights, what Roosevelt taught us about the environment and big stick diplomacy, about American power abroad and how we project it," he says, folding his hands beneath his chin and staring out his window. "We have Nixon who created the EPA, for heaven's sake. People forget that."

In challenging Republican heterodoxies at a time when most in the party seemed to be circling the wagons, Huntsman quickly became a political sensation. He made The Washington Post's list of the ten most influential Republicans this month (after being absent from a similar list only four months earlier), with the Post's Chris Cillizza crowning him "the most popular politician in the country at the moment."

 

Huntsman stands anxiously at the front of the Gold Room, a massive hall in Utah's capitol building decked in gold leafing, crystal chandeliers, and thick lavender velvet curtains. After presenting a bill on migratory bird protection--one of six bill signings today--Huntsman ushers the gathered hunting activists to the big wooden table at the center at the room for the requisite photo-op, which one of the activists interrupts to put a taxidermed mallard in front of the governor. As Huntsman struggles to keep his trademark smile perky for the pictures, six of the activists pull out wooden duck calls and start squawking jubilantly. "Sounds like the legislature is coming in," Huntsman jokes, quickly exchanging the requisite hand-shakes and pleasantries before darting out the back door.

I could already tell when I was in Utah in April that Huntsman was antsy with some of the more provincial aspects of being governor. But he was coy when I asked him if he had any intention of running for president. "It's kind of presumptuous to say that anybody is part of the mix for future office at this point," he tells me. As for being on everyone's shortlist for 2012, "Yeah, okay, my kids think it's positively hilarious. It proves to me they've really run through every other name in the party and so they're left with the few who are still standing as Republican elected officials--and probably proves a point that there aren't that many of us left."

But all indications were that he was already gearing up for a 2012 run. He had announced his intention not to seek a third term as governor. He had taken a number of recent trips to key Republican primary states such as Michigan and South Carolina, where he met with state kingmakers, and hosted major donors to the Republican Governor's Association in Utah in March. He had been flying to places as far away as India and Israel on "trade missions" for the state. "Though Israel is a legitimate subject for business ventures, it's also useful for a presidential hopeful to be able to say, ‘When I was in Israel ....'," snarked Utah's Daily Herald. He also consulted with Republican uber-strategist Frank Luntz and, according to Politico, was a month away from launching a PAC. "Huntsman is clearly positioning for a 2012 run," Cillizza wrote earlier this month.

If Huntsman was planning to run for president, why would he move so brazenly to the left at a time when the GOP seems to be heading rightward? The most obvious reason is that he may actually be a moderate. "I'm not very good at tags," he tells me. "I just try to do my best, and maybe that makes me a pragmatist." He joins a long tradition of moderate Republicans from Utah, despite--or perhaps because of--the fact that the state is the reddest in the country, with the GOP holding every statewide office and more than two-thirds of the state legislature. The GOP lock on Utah politics allows the party to welcome a broader swathe of politicians, and breed leaders who are less combative and ideological than their besieged colleagues in more competitive states. And if Huntsman has learned anything from the failed Mitt Romney campaign, it is that the only thing worse for a Republican than not being a conservative is being a phony conservative.

But on a more strategic level, Huntsman was forced to fill the political space that had been left for him by the current front-runners--including Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, and Romney himself--who were all pandering to the conservative wing of the party. Huntsman would have had a tough time competing for the same constituency as them; better to take the long shot that Republicans would be looking for a moderate in three years. In the meantime, he could sit back and let the more conservative candidates beat each other up.

If that sounds a lot like John McCain's 2008 strategy, it's probably not a coincidence. Huntsman has considered McCain both a close personal friend and a role model ever since the two took a trip to Iraq together in 2006 and Huntsman agreed to chair his political action committee. Huntsman shocked Utah's political establishment by endorsing McCain in the 2008 presidential primary over the Mormon state's favorite son, Romney. And, a few weeks ago, he even took on McCain's chief campaign strategist, John Weaver, as an advisor.

Huntsman seems to have learned another lesson from the Romney campaign: A Mormon, no matter how conservative, cannot win amongst the right wing of the party--particularly evangelicals. Romney thought he could win their favor by becoming a drum-beating social conservative, underestimating the deep-rooted antipathy many evangelicals have toward Mormons. A recent Pew poll found that 39 percent of evangelicals hold negative views of Mormons--a sentiment Mike Huckabee used against Romney. Though RNC Chair Michael Steele was lambasted last week for saying "the base ... rejected Mitt because it had issues with Mormonism," he wasn't that far off: According to a study by John C. Green and Mark Silk, the size of the evangelical community was one of the best predictors of Romney's success or failure in each state; without the evangelical vote, they argue, Romney probably would have won in four of the five southern states he lost. In light of Romney's experience, the more likely base for Huntsman would have been the moderate wing of the party, which is less concerned with religion in general (and the LDS church specifically).

But not leaving that to chance, Huntsman also actively worked to distance himself from the LDS church in recent months. His statement of support for civil unions came right on the heels of the Mormon church's very visible role in passing Proposition 8 in California. "I felt as governor that I needed to respond," he admits. Though bold in its own right, the position also establishes his independence from the church. He similarly flouted LDS doctrine this March by overturning Utah's restrictive alcohol laws, originally implemented in 1935 under pressure from the church. "It might sound like a small thing to people on the outside, but it was actually fairly historic move," he tells me. Some say his endorsement of McCain over Romney was also meant to show his independence from the Mormon community.

 

Huntsman was assembling all the pieces for his presidential campaign. And as he positioned himself as the next John McCain, he was gaining traction nationally: According to a nationwide March poll, likely 2012 voters chose Huntsman's vision for the GOP over Rush Limbaugh's vision by 20 points. So what happened?

Huntsman received a rude awakening from the GOP rank-and-file, who don't seem to be looking for another maverick in 2012. Last month, the Kent County Republican Party in Michigan revoked a speaking invitation. "The voters want and expect us to stand on principle and return to our roots. Unfortunately, by holding an event with Governor Huntsman, we would be doing the exact opposite," Chairwoman Joanne Voorhees wrote in an e-mail to party members. "Presumably he is testing the waters [for a presidential run] and we hope he realizes now the waters in Michigan will be hazardous to someone who endorses the homosexual activist political agenda," elaborated Gary Glenn, director of the Campaign for Michigan Families, to the Salt Lake Tribune. "That whole experience really jarred him," says a source close to Huntsman.

The party elite doesn't seem to like him much either. Huntsman was one of the only national Republican figures to be left out of the National Council for a New America--the Republican Party’s national outreach effort to rebrand itself--which includes Palin, Romney, and Jindal.

Huntsman lacked the national profile that allowed McCain to buck the party line and build his own constituency. The scion of one of Utah's most prominent and well-liked families, he was able to win a fiercely competitive Republican primary for governor in 2004 based largely on his last name. But the moniker will not get him far outside the Beehive State. "It's safe to say that Governor Huntsman's name ID is zero in New Hampshire," Fergus Cullen, the former Republican Party chairman in the key early primary state, told the Salt Lake Tribune. As recently as last month, both CNN and The Dallas Morning News referred to the governor as "Jim Huntsman."

And if Huntsman was on his way to becoming a household name, it was largely because of his stance on civil unions--a position that would not play well in early primary states like Iowa, where the party faithful are still roiling over the state supreme court's recent decision to legalize gay marriage. According to a recent University of Iowa poll, 53 percent of Iowa Republicans wish to ban gay marriage and civil unions through a constitutional amendment. All the leading Republican candidates other than Huntsman oppose civil unions.

During our conversations last month in Utah, Huntsman had already begun to realize that perhaps the Republican Party was not ready for him. "You cannot have a successful party based upon a very narrow band, demographically," he tells me. "You've gotta broaden it to include more young people, more people of color, more people who are urban-dwellers, more who are the intelligentsia in America, many who have jettisoned the party. … And that's ultimately I think how it's going to play out. We're just not there yet." Two years was probably not enough time for the party to change. "He realized he'd just be beating his head against the wall with these guys, which made him open to the phone call [from Obama]," says another source close to Huntsman. "If he thought he had a real chance to be the standard-bearer and savior of the party, obviously he would have said no."

Huntsman has a good role-model for his duck-and-run strategy: George H. W. Bush, who went to China as ambassador in the 1970s while Republicans dealt with the Watergate fallout. He was able to avoid the Republican bloodbath at the 1974 polls, and return relatively unscathed from the fracas--eventually making his way to the White House. Heading to Beijing will allow Huntsman to sit out the mess that will probably envelop the GOP over the next few years, and return as a fresh face in time to gear up for 2016. It is also likely that some of his more controversial positions, particularly on civil unions, will become less toxic by then.

The ambassadorship also equips Huntsman well for a later presidential run. Representing the United States to perhaps our most important strategic rival will give him top-notch foreign policy chops. And since the 2016 race could well be a competition for heir to the Obama mantle, Huntsman will now have bipartisan cred to add to his youth and proven pragmatism in claiming it; an appointment from the man himself doesn't hurt either.

To be sure, the position does entail some risks for Huntsman. He will be at the center of such GOP hot-button issues as China's currency devaluation (about which Rustbelt Republicans introduced a bill in the House last week) and Beijing's human rights abuses, neither of which has an easy solution that would satisfy the party's base. He will also be the administration's pointman in getting China's cooperation on Iran, North Korea, and Darfur--all attempts that are likely to fail, and can be used against him during a future presidential run. "There is the danger that he appears to have become a panda-hugger," says Chris Nelson, the editor of Samuels International Associates' Nelson Report about foreign policy and trade issues, who has worked with Huntsman for over a decade. "That's always a vulnerability for any U.S. government official, and even more so for a Republican guy serving a Democratic president. I don't see how he can avoid that."

Still, the appointment appears to make a lot of sense for Huntsman. It also, of course, makes perfect sense for Obama. Sources in the State Department say that while Wendy Sherman was the front-runner for the post, the Obama camp was concerned that she was too focused on North Korea (she was the North Korea policy coordinator under Madeleine Albright) and that she was too close to Clinton. And since Timothy Geithner will be handling much of the administration’s economic relations with China, the next biggest item on the agenda is collaborating with China on climate change. "The focus will shift to environment," the State Department staffer says--an issue on which Huntsman is particularly qualified. Huntsman's experience as a politician will also help him sell some of Obama's pragmatic China policies back at home.

But it is no coincidence that the impetus to appoint Huntsman came from Obama's political staff, not the State Department. It is unlikely that Obama actually felt threatened by a Huntsman run--but at the very least, confronting him in a campaign would have been tougher than running against some of the more right-wing GOP contenders. And on a broader level, by sending Huntsman to China, Obama ensures that Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney remain the chief Republican spokesmen, further alienating the party from mainstream voters in time for the 2010 midterms and even the 2012 elections. Appointing Huntsman also helps Obama shore up his bipartisan credentials after the failed debacle of his Judd Gregg appointment.

In fact, perhaps the only loser in Huntsman's appointment is the Republican Party itself. In light of Arlen Specter's defection and Tom Ridge's decision not to run for his Senate seat, the clear message is that there is no place in the party for moderate voices. Huntsman's departure clears the way for Romney to continue his ascendancy to front-runner status, unencumbered by the presence of another wealthy, Mormon, business-savvy technocrat in the race.

Huntsman is perfectly content to bide his time. Quoting political historian Theodore White, he told me when we spoke last month that he was happy to defer "to the inevitable cycles of history. Some of them are so inexorable you can't fight against them." In deciding to go to China, he seemed to be conceding that he wasn't going to win the battle for the GOP's soul this time around. Better to wait for the cycles of history to align in your favor.

Correction: This article originally stated that Huntsman was one of the only Republican governors to accept money from Obama’s stimulus package. The article has been corrected to reflect the fact that all governors eventually accepted some amount of stimulus money. Huntsman accepted all the money offered to his state while many Republican governors rejected parts of the funding.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Show all 45 comments

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

45 comments

Nicely done! Bob

- Bob Springmeyer

May 20, 2009 at 12:43am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I found your article very informative. I believe that moderation is the key to the resurgance of the GOP and Gov Huntsman is the perfect counter to Obama. However,I must correct your statement that Huntsman was the only Republican governor to willingly accept money from the stimulus package. The Republican governors of California and Florida were willing recipients as well.

- Trajan

May 20, 2009 at 3:48am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

krieger is a treasure at tnr. great article.

- jay

May 20, 2009 at 8:57am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Solid, even-handed reporting, limited snark and good analysis. Very good article. It will be interesting to watch Huntsman in the coming years.

- twarren08

May 20, 2009 at 9:44am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The best article on Huntsman so far....

- iris

May 20, 2009 at 9:50am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"It's safe to say that Governor Huntsman's name ID is zero in New Hampshire," said the former chair of the RNC. No more! Huntsman is certainly a guy to watch as the next few years go by. He sounds like he would do well here in the Granite State. And kudos to Krieger for a great piece of writing.

- Bruce from NH

May 20, 2009 at 10:00am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

One of the most balanced, informed treatments of today's Republican situation, the currents and counter-currents of politics in Wash DC, the West and Utah surrounding the Jon Huntsman phenom. As one who is looking for a way to return to the Republican fold, but as one "moderate" who also eschews labels, I am pleased that Krieger's article has hit so many some key nails on the head. Her U.S.-China analysis was another big plus.

- Ralph Thomson

May 20, 2009 at 10:30am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Very good article. Maybe the GOP's light at the end of the tunnel isn't a train after all.

- lmpub

May 20, 2009 at 10:51am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Mormons helped pass not defeat Prop 8. McCain's first win in 2008 was New Hampshire after Obama had already won Iowa. In surmounting resistance to moderates, McCain had not just recognition but also, as a war hero with long experience in government, the story and resume that appeared well-suited to pit against Obama's (mis)perceived weaknesses. Even if Obama's approval rating were to fall 10 points 3 and a half years from now, he'd still be in the mid to high 50s and difficult to beat in a general election. If it stays where it is, almost impossible. They may as well let 65-year old Romney take his last try, then look ahead after that.

- birchbeer

May 20, 2009 at 1:10pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

fascinating story and well written. A nit: Utah politics aside, the Mormon Church structure does not oppose civil unions, only gay marriage.

- reb

May 20, 2009 at 1:30pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Ahhh, yes. The little taco stand on wheels at the Sears store. It is an institution. This bit should tell one how down to earth Jon is. Don't worry Jon, my lips are sealed.

- The beaner

May 20, 2009 at 2:35pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I was born and raised on the Wasatch Front in Utah. I'm a non-mormon and generally skew moderate to democrat (which in this state means I'm oft accused of being a bleeding heart liberal etc.) I have voted for Gov. Huntsman twice now and would proudly vote for him again in a heartbeat. His foresight and skill have made my home state the envy of the country fiscally and he currently holds the title of "My Favorite Republican" (a title once held by John McCain until he lost his mind in the last election. My current favorite McCain is now Megan) When I was younger the G.O.P. held the distinction of being the party of the intellectuals but sadly, that era is now over. All my friends and family who would call themselves republicans are being systematically thrown out of the party because they dare to differ in one or more small ways with the inflexible party-line and it seems they will continue to do so until there is nothing but the antiquated "flat earth society" left behind. Gov. Huntsman should be a shining example of what the future of the G.O.P. is supposed to look like. But sadly, they would rather seek irrelevance and obscurity.

- S.L.C. Native

May 20, 2009 at 3:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Huntsman can out McCain McCain. Good riddance!

- Blue Eyed Indian

May 20, 2009 at 3:24pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty. $30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger. $550 billion: U.S. Defense budget

- Abel Tsegga

May 20, 2009 at 3:39pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This former Republican will certainly consider returning to the party to vote for Gov. Huntsman, IF, the party purges itself of the rightwing wackos like Limbaugh, Cheney, Gingrich, Palin and the religious nutcases. Otherwise, forget it.

- ADevine

May 20, 2009 at 4:05pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The piece should have delved more into the Huntsman/Romney divide and why the former endorsed McCain. Word has it that Huntsman actively campaigned among insiders to take over the then scandal-plagued 2002 SLC Olympics and was greatly insensed when Romney (who did not seek the SLOC position) was solicted for the job and accepted it.

- not treated

May 20, 2009 at 5:23pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Could it possibly be that there are some significant things one can do with one's life other than seek the Presidency, and that the opportunity to play a significant role in shaping our relations with the emerging China is a project uniquely suited to Huntsman's talents, experience, and passions? This may be one of the rare examples where President Obama's interest in working constructively with members of the opposition party can achieve fruition and positive results. It does take two, and Huntsman appears to be one of the few Republicans interested in something beyond political gamesmanship.

- The Wise Bard

May 20, 2009 at 6:09pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Huntsman is the billionaire heir of a man whose chemical company poisoned the groundwater in many Texas communities. He is also my Governor and I am mildly bemused at the liberal media's love for a man they obviously don't know. Jonny is a rich boy who has accomplished nada without the help of his billionaire daddy. The difference between Romney and Hutnsman is that Romney has actually accomplished things in life. Jonny merely lived off of his fathers accomplishments.

- RyanT.

May 20, 2009 at 6:15pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Strangely enough, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (or LDS Church) is not openly against civil unions for gay and lesbian couples. Proposals for civil unions have been advanced to some degree in Utah, with no small help from Gov. Huntsman's foray into this area, and the Church has voiced no opposition. The Church has only taken an official position against gay marriage, and there is no reason to believe that it would come out strongly against civil unions or other similar arrangements.

- Matt Baker

May 20, 2009 at 6:40pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Excellent article on Huntsman...Romney may be a phony conservative but he lost because of religious bigotry. We've made significant progress against racism and sexism, but not religious bigotry...sad

- PJ

May 20, 2009 at 6:48pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The Republican party isn't the only group that loses out because Huntsman's going to China. Utah also loses; it loses the best governor it's had in a long time.

- Tim

May 20, 2009 at 7:16pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Another fine example of why TNR is now my favourite online read.

- NorthOfTheBorder

May 20, 2009 at 7:34pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You write about Huntsman: "He is also one of the only Republican governors to accept money from Obama's stimulus package." Did not ALL the Republican governors accept money from Obama's stimulus package?

- Rocky

May 20, 2009 at 9:49pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

This is an amazing article coming from the source of the fake Iraq war diaries. Barring a misstatement of Mormon church policy ( no objection to civil unions at all, no objection to serving liquor to those that want it) it was informative and even insightful without the self gratification / justification of opinions I have sadly come to expect from TNR. Please accept my surprised congratulations and my encouragement to bring back journalism with more pieces like this.

- Strategent

May 20, 2009 at 11:00pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Thoroughly enjoyed the article. I only recently heard of him (through the Obama appointment), but his is a name I will remember for the future.

- japanagogo

May 21, 2009 at 12:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Unless he starts to make some good proposals or make solid record on environment, labor, and civil rights issues all these are just talks. He could support one thing and do another / or backtrack like most politicians, like Obama. Leaders of government have become less and less accountable in general, it makes me wonder why don't we just select a couple of direct representatives from multinationals and financial institutions to run the show instead of electing parasites that receive money from professional lobbyists while still leaching off taxpayers. Oh wait we are doing that... just look at the TARP show.

- Anonymous

May 21, 2009 at 1:16am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

"One of the only Republican Governors to accept money from the stimulus package"? According to recovery.gov, they ALL asked for and received money.

- Dave

May 21, 2009 at 2:29am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

He is also *one of the only* Republican governors to accept money from Obama's stimulus package... not *THE* only. Oops, Trajan. Also, a word about style...? I look forward to a time where the media follows the Church's style guide suggestions and stops referring to it as the "Mormon" Church. I realize that it's so readers know who's being referred to, but this article seems, strangely, to vacillate between the use of "Mormon" and "LDS," which is more (but not completely) correct. You wouldn't call Catholics "Papists," and you shouldn't really call Latter-day Saints "Mormons." :)

- Eric

May 21, 2009 at 7:17am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I know you guys are not too bright, and haven't bothered w/ fact checkers in a decade, but ALL Republican governors have thier hands out. They just grandstand until media idiots portray them as not taking the money--then they take the money.

- tomdurk

May 21, 2009 at 7:55am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I know you guys are not too bright, and haven't bothered w/ fact checkers in a decade, but ALL Republican governors have thier hands out. They just grandstand until media idiots portray them as not taking the money--then they take the money.

- tomdurk

May 21, 2009 at 8:01am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

You think its hard as a Mormon? Try running for political office in America today as an open atheist! Now THAT is the last, great, political bias in America! Correction to the article: Huntsman isn't the only (or one of the only) GOP Governors to accept stimulus money. ALL the Republican governors have accepted stimulus funding. Go to Recovery.gov where you can view the state certifications required to obtain stimulus funding, and you will find 50 state certifications, signed by 50 governors!

- Zoomie

May 21, 2009 at 8:04am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

In a May 20 article for The New Republic on Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., whom President Obama has selected as his nominee to be U.S. ambassador to China, deputy online editor Zvika Krieger wrongly described Huntsman as "one of the only Republican governors to accept money from Obama's stimulus package." In fact, all Republican governors have requested funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. State certifications from the governors of all 50 states indicating that they will request and use recovery funds are posted at Recovery.gov. Indeed, every state, including those with Republican governors, has received at least some recovery funds. For example, according to a quarterly progress report on progress in implementing the recovery act, submitted to the president and released May 13, "All but three states, Hawaii, North Dakota, and New Mexico, had begun drawing down FMAP [Federal Medical Assistance Percentages] funds by May 5th. North Dakota began drawing down funds on May 8th." Hawaii and New Mexico have reportedly received recovery funds as well. Some Republican governors, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, have requested access to funding available through the recovery act, but have rejected small portions of the funding. And on May 19, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford -- the final governor to request recovery funding, sending the certification on the deadline day -- "vetoed state budget sections compelling him to spend stimulus funds, saying the budget failed to put South Carolina in a better post-stimulus financial position, and that it wasted a once-in-a-generation chance to make much-needed reforms to state government."

- Tim O'Connor

May 21, 2009 at 8:14am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Huntsman is not the only GOP Gov to accept stimulus funds, as this article asserts. In fact, every GOP Gov has accepted stimulus funds.

- DC Spence

May 21, 2009 at 9:09am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The best description of Utah politics. While it may be the "reddist" state because of the number of GOP politicians, the Republican party is more open to moderates and there is less shrill fighting on capitol hill. Thank you for actually addressing that.

- UtahtoNJ

May 21, 2009 at 9:33am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Every governor in the country has accepted stimulus funds, period.

- Pheo

May 21, 2009 at 10:16am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Excellent article. I could envision if the GOP continues to move more to the right then Huntsman may be ideally placed to run under the Unity party in 2016. Especially if the Democrats nominate someone who is viewed as too partisan (ie Hillary Clinton)

- Andy R

May 21, 2009 at 10:23am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

A well-written article... But, for all this rosy prospect, everyone here seems to forget that McCain LOST the last election. Will running a newer version help or hurt the Republicans? Remains to be seen.

- hcalvin3

May 21, 2009 at 12:47pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Great article from my Utah perspective, though I'm not sure Gov. Huntsman could be characterized as distancing himself from the Mormon Church. The reform of liquor laws here would not have succeeded without agreement of the LDS church, and they also make a distinction between expanding the definition of marriage and extending civil rights to gay couples--not so far really from what the Governor has proposed.

- Mark S

May 21, 2009 at 2:17pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

I thought Borowitz cornered satire but Zvika Krieger has bested him. Reading between the lines is an o-so-funny, o-so-sad presidential wannabe with absolutely no real self-identity. Oops, did I write that? Well yes, another George W if you will.

- Susan

May 21, 2009 at 4:04pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Great to read about what I heard about first-hand. I think you did a great job and it was fun to read. I generally avoid politics, but I will be passing this around to many that I know!

- MD

May 22, 2009 at 11:02am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The fear is that he has sold his soul out to the One World Government of the New World Order; this could explain why he appears to ignore the assult on our Constitution, and her freedoms. The other fear is that so often with those born with the golden spoon, in not having to earn their money, and the struggles therein, he was never grounded on personal ethics and virtue, and principles. This could explain then how he could support John McCain and not Ron Paul. Hopefully, the Spirits of our Founding Fathers will be able to teach him, as he does seem to be being groomed to be President. Just because he goes to China, for a few years, does not stop him from running in 2012. Based on trends, the economy and our civil liberties will be tanked so harmfully by then, enough people will be looking for a new president. God Bless our nation; may we each repent so God will Bless her again.

- Kyle

May 22, 2009 at 5:32pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Huntsman needs to be in China for 4 years, and then get back to the thick of national politics, maybe by running for senate or something. This article revealed some promising personal and political traits of the governor, but to be a successful national leader, Huntsman needs to much better define his governing philosophy, like Reagan and Obama have done. If he can articulate a complete vision, this independent voter is willing to consider voting for him.

- dher

May 23, 2009 at 1:36am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

The author seems to find gay marriage synonymous with civil union. Certainly Huntsman is not alone in appreciating the difference. Ask any gay rights activist. Many who supported Prop 8 in California have no disagreement with civil unions.

- MGS

May 26, 2009 at 12:56am

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Zivka Krieger writes brilliantly, though he would do well to have consulted with more ordinary residents of Utah to assess their view of Gov. Hunstman. Here in Moab, Hunstman was perceived as a triangulator who protected both the environment as well as business interests; he supports a moderate social agenda but pushes for government accommodation of the State's controlling interest, the Church of LDS. Krieger's coverage is deeply impressive, but he needs to clip into a MTB and come ride with us sometime.

- Daniel Feldman

June 14, 2009 at 1:55pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

Zvika Krieger is a god among men

- geist

July 1, 2009 at 8:37pm

You must be a subscriber to post comments. Subscribe today.

SHARE HIGHLIGHT

0 CHARACTERS SELECTED

TWEET THIS

POST TO TUMBLR

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

Close