JUNE 23, 2011
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

On April 18, a transgender woman named Chrissy Lee Polis went to the women’s bathroom in a Baltimore County McDonald’s. When she came out, two teenage girls approached and spat in her face. Then they threw her to the floor and started kicking her in the head. As a crowd of customers watched, Polis tried to stand up, but the girls dragged her by her hair across the restaurant, ripping the earrings out of her ears. The last thing Polis remembers, before she had a seizure, was spitting blood on the restaurant door. The incident made national news—not because this sort of violence against transgender people is unusual, but because a McDonald’s employee recorded the beating on his cell phone and posted the video on YouTube.
Transgender people are some of the least protected, most persecuted people in the United States. In a recent study of transgender students, nearly half said they’d been “punched, kicked, or injured with a weapon” at least once in the last year. On average, a transgender person is murdered because of their identity every month, according to the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund. In 2008, for instance, Angie Zapata, an 18-year-old Colorado woman, was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher when her attacker—a man she met through a social-networking site—realized that she was born male.
Check out the gallery of stories and images of transgender Americans accompanying this TNR cover story.
Transgender people are regularly evicted from their homes, fired from their jobs, and denied medical treatment. Last July, emergency room staff in an Indiana hospital refused to help a trans woman who was coughing up blood, referring to her as “it.” More than a quarter of transgender people surveyed say they have lost a job because of discrimination. Transgender people are more likely to become homeless (at an average age of 13, in New York City). And then there is the obstacle course of inconveniences that reminds transgender people every day that they don’t belong. One trans woman told me her company requires her to lock herself in when she uses the restroom—even though it’s multi-occupancy—so she is acutely aware of making other women wait. In some states, a court order is required to change a person’s gender on a driver’s license. Many health insurance plans only cover procedures for one gender, so a person born male who transitions to female can’t get both a prostate check and a mammogram.
For some, these challenges prove insurmountable. Four years ago, Mike Penner, a longtime sports columnist for the Los Angeles Times, came out to the world as Christine Daniels. But, after a year and a half, unable to cope with the scrutiny, she changed her name back to Mike and returned to living as a man. A year later, she killed herself. Daniels’s story was tragically typical: More than one in three transgender people attempt suicide at some point in their lives.
But these are statistics, and people are rarely moved by statistics. In this country, civil rights movements have prevailed when they have convinced enough people that a minority is being treated in a way that is fundamentally un-American. For this to happen, people need to see members of a disadvantaged group as human beings before anything else. The gay rights movement, for instance, has made great strides in large part because increasing numbers of people know, or are related to, an openly gay person. For more and more people, gays and lesbians do not seem strange—but the idea of denying them rights does. Such a breakthrough seems unlikely for the transgender movement. According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, there are only around 700,000 transgender people in the United States, compared with around eight million gay, lesbian, and bisexual people.They are invisible in a way that other minorities are not.
Until quite recently, I had never thought much about any of this. Then, I met Caroline Temmermand. It started with a simple reporting assignment: I wanted to write about speech lessons for people transitioning between genders, and a speech therapist put me in touch with Caroline, a 56-year-old employee of county government in Virginia. When I called, she invited me to a rally for transgender rights, and I decided to go along. On a cold day in February, Caroline picked me up at my apartment. Although she is six foot two, with broad shoulders, she has a womanly shape. She wore black pants, simple black ballet flats, a cropped jacket, and a long black coat with subtle fur lining. Her voice and manner were effortlessly feminine.
At first, I tried not to look too closely at her, as if scanning for signs of masculinity—this was before Caroline had had any facial surgery, and I thought I could see it in her face. But I forgot my awkwardness as Caroline launched into conversation. At that point, she had only been living openly as a woman for about nine months, and she was still caught up in the excitement of it all. I later learned that Caroline is like this with nearly everyone: chatty and eager to form connections. (She signs all her e-mails “hugs.”) She has a weakness for goofy jokes, which she uses to put people at ease—when calculating the tip at restaurants, she often cracks, “Ever since I became a woman, I just can’t do math anymore!” She is very emotional, with a tendency to cry at the drop of a dime. This may partly be because of her hormone treatments, but as I got to know her better, I also thought that perhaps she had wanted to live as a woman for so long that she was taking the chance to enjoy every aspect of stereotypical femininity. Her favorite movie is Message in a Bottle, a romantic weepie starring Kevin Costner; Caroline told me she cried so much that she had to see the film six or seven times until she made it all the way to the end.
The day we met, we went to lunch at an Olive Garden, to the rally, and then to dinner at Applebee’s, spending nearly ten hours together. She talked to me about her family, her relationships, and the process of transitioning from life as a man to life as a woman. At one point, she offered to demonstrate for me the voice she’d used as a man—which some transgender people might be reluctant to do—and suddenly it felt as if another person was speaking to me from inside Caroline’s body. After our first hour together, I couldn’t think of her as anything but a woman.
Caroline’s story isn’t exceptional, except in the way that every transgender person’s story is exceptional. In many ways, she has been luckier than most. But the more I got to know her, the more the treatment of transgender people in the United States appeared both appalling and absurd to me. At some subterranean level, transgender people provoke deep fear and hostility in our culture. They complicate categories that many people would prefer to think of as fixed. One might think that, as the gay rights movement has advanced, transgender people would share equally in its gains. But, in fact, the mainstreaming of the gay rights cause has created tensions between the two movements, and at times the transgender community has been pushed aside. Transgender people clearly need more protection from our laws and society. But they can’t win these victories on their own. Like every minority group at the outset of a civil rights campaign, they will need the rest of us to take the time to understand their lives—and maybe even try to imagine ourselves in their shoes.
CAROLINE WAS BORN Stephen James Temmermand in 1955 in southern New Jersey, the third of eight children. (Transgender people find it offensive to be referred to by their pre-transition gender, because they point out that they always were their current gender. Nevertheless, I will use the pronoun “he” for the period of Caroline’s life when she lived as a man to avoid confusion; but, to be clear, Caroline is now and has always been a woman.) Steve’s dad, a mechanic, left when he was young. His older sister Maureen remembers him as a typical boy—very skinny, always hungry.
But Steve wasn’t a typical boy at all. At night, he would creep out of the bedroom he shared with his four brothers and put on his sisters’ dresses, making sure to wake up early to change back into his pajamas so that no one would know. In seventh grade, a counselor sent him to a psychologist, who asked him to draw a self-portrait. Steve drew a picture of a girl. The psychologist warned Steve to keep quiet—if he didn’t, she said, he could end up in an institution.
In high school, Steve played football, ran track, and started to feel attracted to girls. He figured the urge to wear feminine clothes must be a passing phase. Although his grades were good, he couldn’t afford college, so, after graduating, he took a series of jobs that seemed to affirm his manliness, like construction and fixing up cars. When he was 19, he worked up the courage to go into a JC Penney and buy a blue women’s blouse. For a long time, he convinced himself that he was a cross-dresser.
One night at a club during his early twenties, Steve met the woman who would become his wife. They married less than two years later and eventually had three kids. On the outside, Steve was thriving. He had his own construction business and was working toward a college degree and learning to fly planes. But his family life was another story. Steve simply couldn’t see himself as a good husband and father. “I felt like I had an incurable defect,” Caroline told me. After seven years of marriage, Steve decided to leave. The children stayed with their mother.
After the divorce, Steve gave his family all the extra money he had. He fell into a deep depression and for a period wound up living in his car. He stopped going to see his kids; his friends and family didn’t know where he was. Once, his friends found him sleeping in his car wearing a nightgown and makeup. But they never talked about it.
When Steve’s youngest son, Dave, was 13 years old, Steve resurfaced. His two older children didn’t want to reconnect, but slowly Steve and Dave formed a relationship. It was awkward at first. At the time, Dave was struggling in high school, and on one evening Steve made the two-hour drive from his home in Maryland to his ex-wife’s place in New Jersey, helped Dave with his homework, and then left before dawn to get back in time for work. He insisted that Dave go to college; and, after Dave was accepted to a school in Maryland, he moved in with his father.
In 2004, Steve met a woman named Diane through Match.com. Diane has wavy blonde hair, brown eyes, and a focused intelligence. On their first date, they met at a Borders for chai tea, and Steve scribbled diagrams on a napkin to show Diane how planes worked. It was, in nearly every way, a perfect pairing. They had both found professional success-Diane as a radio news producer in Washington, D.C., and Steve as a manager in county government. Steve was more even-keeled than Diane, and he liked being there to steady her. They built a happy life together, along with Diane’s two sons from a previous marriage. Watching Steve patiently help her kids with their schoolwork, Diane sometimes felt that he was a better parent to her boys than she or their father had been. Occasionally, she would tell him, “You are the best man I know,” which would make him cry, because, in the deepest sense, he knew it wasn’t true.
Yet as much as they loved each other, both Diane and Steve sensed that something wasn’t right. Although their sex life was mostly good, Steve would never initiate anything. “She wanted me to act like a man,” says Caroline, “and, in some ways, I wanted to be treated like a woman, too.” Over the years, Diane asked Steve to marry her five times, but Steve could never say yes. Diane also urged Steve to see a therapist, but he wouldn’t do it. After five years, Diane felt she had to end it.
Devastated, Steve finally forced himself to talk to someone. He chose a therapist who specialized in transgender issues. “I was hoping there was a way around it,” Caroline told me. “Maybe there is a new pill or maybe there is a new treatment, maybe what I feel is not really what I feel.” After a few weeks, the therapist asked Steve what he thought his diagnosis was, and, for the first time, he said it out loud: “Oh my God, I’m trans.” “My heart really sunk,” Caroline recalls, “because I recognized what that means to a lot of people.”
TRANSGENDER, transsexual, transvestite, cross-dresser: All of these terms mean different things, but most people probably can’t outline the differences. The most useful term, “transgender,” was coined in the 1980s and came to encompass any person who acts outside the social norms assigned to their biological gender, from a butch woman to an effeminate man to transsexuals like Caroline, who medically alter their bodies with hormones, surgery, or both. (Transgender people are mostly considered separate from “intersex” people, who are born with ambiguous genitalia.) Contrary to popular assumption, a lot of transgender people don’t have sexual-reassignment surgery, either because they can’t afford it (health insurance often won’t cover it unless the employer pays extra) or because they prefer not to undergo such a major procedure. Trans men are even less likely to get surgery because the process is so complex. (As one doctor observed to me, it’s “easier to dig a hole than build a pole.”) Perhaps the most important thing to understand is that being transgender has nothing do with sex, sexual orientation, or genitalia, but is rather about gender identity.
Transgender people have been around since the beginning of human history, often enjoying greater acceptance—even reverence—than they experience in the United States today. The transgender medical revolution began in Germany in the early twentieth century, at the institute of Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, a gay German sexologist, who oversaw numerous sexual-reassignment surgeries in the 1930s. Adolf Hitler described him as the “most dangerous man in Germany,” and Hirschfeld fled to France. One of his acquaintances, Harry Benjamin, emigrated to the United States and became the leading doctor for people suffering from a condition he termed “transsexual.” His treatment plan to help patients transition remains the prevailing standard of care.
For a long time, gay and trans people were equally marginalized in the United States, and so they tended to band together. But this all started to change with the rise of the modern gay rights movement, which began in earnest in June 1969, after the police raided the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village. By some accounts, the Stonewall riot broke out when a drag queen named Sylvia Rivera threw a beer bottle. When the officers retreated into the inn and barricaded the door, Rivera and others rammed it with an uprooted parking meter. After Stonewall, Rivera lobbied tirelessly to help the Gay Activists Alliance (GAA) pass a gay and transsexual rights bill in New York City—and got arrested for scaling City Hall in high heels and a dress. But not long afterward, the GAA dropped drag queens’ and transsexuals’ rights from their agenda.
In 1973, the gay rights movement succeeded in removing homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). At the same time, transsexuals were moving in the opposite direction, and, in 1980, transsexualism was added to the DSM, providing a means to obtain access to hormone therapy, reassignment surgery, and other treatments. (Transsexualism was later incorporated into the controversial designation “Gender Identity Disorder.” The entry is under revision for the next version of the DSM, to be published in 2013.) Susan Stryker, the author of Transgender History, says a sense started to emerge in the gay community that transsexuals were not only different from gay people, but somehow inferior as well.
In 1973, Rivera was blocked from speaking at the ceremony to commemorate Stonewall. That same year, a lesbian conference disagreed about letting transsexual lesbian singer Beth Elliott perform there, because she was really “a man.” Janice Raymond, now a professor emerita of women’s studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, articulated one particularly radical anti-trans strain within the feminist movement, writing in 1979, “All transsexuals rape women’s bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves.”
Rather than challenging society’s accepted norms as they once had, the gay community came to embrace those norms, arguing that gay people were exactly like straight people in every way except their sexual orientation. That wasn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it left less space for trans people in the broader movement. “When things started getting more mainstream,” Rivera told the Village Voice, “it was like, ‘We don’t need you no more.’”
ABOUT THREE WEEKS after her breakthrough with the therapist, Steve went to see Diane. They went into the bedroom, sat on the bed, and Steve told Diane that she was a woman. Steve’s deepest secret was out. She had finally come to terms with the fact that she was a woman and a lesbian; she felt that now she could marry Diane with a clear conscience. Diane was heartbroken to realize that Steve had lived with this secret for so many years. But Diane also knew she couldn’t go back to living with her former partner.
Next, Steve told her friends. One of the first was Susan Shull, a high school friend whom Steve had nursed through a tough divorce. When Steve called with a confession to make, Susan blurted out, “You want to be a woman.” Since then, Susan says, little about their relationship has changed, except now they sometimes talk about clothes. Not all her friendships survived the transition: Some friends drifted away, and there were others Steve just couldn’t tell.
Then there was Dave. The thought of breaking the news to her son filled Steve with fear. By then, Dave had finished college and dreamed of going to med school. Steve was terrified to do anything that might throw him off course. So she waited until Dave got his acceptance letter and gave him a few days to bask in his success. One day, he came home to find his dad wearing gold hoop earrings, like something you might see on a 15-year-old girl. “I thought, ‘Oh my god, my dad is gay, whatever,’” Dave says. After Steve explained, Dave was shocked but supportive. But, a few days later, it started to sink in. “You start to realize that they are gone,” he says. “Whoa, I am not going to have a dad anymore.”
But the hardest part was always going to be Steve’s extended family. Steve and her siblings had been estranged from their father for many years, so Steve had mentored her brothers and sisters and sometimes helped out with money. She was afraid her siblings couldn’t handle the loss of a second father figure.
A planner by nature, Steve organized a family reunion in Georgia in October 2010. Before the event, she e-mailed everyone to tell them the news and then called each person to discuss it. After the last call, she got stabbing pains in her chest. Doctors kept her at the hospital for 24 hours. It was an anxiety attack, the physical aftershock of hiding herself for so many years.
When Steve showed up at the reunion, her sister Maureen recalls that she looked like a man in drag. At that point, Steve hadn’t figured out how to dress like a woman. She wore the wrong make-up and a satin evening blouse just to walk around during the day. Her hair was growing out, but she was washing it too often, so it looked frizzy. Steve brought everyone together in the hotel breakfast room. Her younger sister Judy, a devout Baptist, was upset. “God doesn’t make mistakes,” she admonished. Steve’s brother Michael also struggled with the news. But, to Steve’s astonishment, most of the rest of the family accepted her. By the end of the weekend, Judy was giving her hair and make-up tips, and Michael came around eventually, too. After the reunion, her brother Jesse suggested her new name: Caroline.
In a number of ways, Caroline’s transition followed a typical path. Until recent years, most male-to-female transgender people did not transition until middle age and had often been married and had children. (Anecdotally, therapists told me that clients have been coming to them at younger ages.) The process usually begins with therapy. In March, Caroline began taking hormones. She developed breasts and her muscle mass decreased—she can no longer do the heavy construction work she did as a man. In April, she had facial-feminization surgery, which raised her eyebrows and shrunk the space between her nose and mouth, a procedure some trans women say is even more psychologically important than sexual-reassignment surgery.
Every week, Caroline also attends voice lessons at a clinic in Washington, D.C. When it comes to vocal adjustment, transitioning male-to-females have a tough time, because estrogen does not make the voice higher. And there is a lot more to speech than hormones. Men speak in monotones, using volume instead of pitch to emphasize different syllables, with their heads perpendicular to their shoulders, while women tilt and move their heads and speak in rising and falling pitches. Male voices originate in the chest, female voices in the throat. This is the difference between a man who speaks in falsetto and a man who learns how to really speak like a woman.
I watched from an observation room as a clinician sat at a computer that monitors pitch and asked Caroline to hold certain vowel sounds for as long as she could. To me, her voice sounded quite feminine, but Caroline was tough on herself: After one assessment, she guessed that her pitch was 145. (Anything between 145 and 165 is considered gender neutral.) The clinician reassured her: The real number was 198, very close to the average range of feminine pitch of 210-220. Caroline then read a passage selected to contain all the sounds in the English language. This time, her average pitch was 177, just above gender neutral. “I still can’t find my voice,” says Caroline, disappointed. She also had work to do on her laugh, her cough, and her sneeze.
Not long after her facial surgery, Caroline’s friend Justine offered to give her a makeover. Justine, who is 41 and works for a home health company, has only known Caroline as a woman—they met in a neighborhood bar. One Sunday, Caroline, Justine, Justine’s mother, and Justine’s 12-year-old daughter went to Ross. Justine and her mother pulled 40 or 50 items off the rack. There were clothes that Caroline would never have picked for herself: It takes years of living in a woman’s body to know instinctively what will look good on a certain shape. The four women piled into the fitting rooms. Caroline nervously pulled Justine aside and reminded her that she hadn’t had bottom surgery. Justine matter-of-factly said her mother and daughter didn’t care. Soon, Caroline was standing in the fitting room in her bra and underwear while the women passed her clothes, everything from work outfits to underwear. “She had this saggy old-woman underwear,” says Justine. “I was like, ‘What the hell are you wearing that for?’” (Especially, Justine added, since Caroline’s ass was better than hers—one benefit of being born a man is the rarity of cellulite.) In the end, Caroline bought 15 outfits, and afterward they went back to Justine’s mother’s house and drank white wine while Justine dyed Caroline’s hair a different shade of brown. When it was done, Justine’s daughter did a photo shoot of the brand new Caroline.
THE CONSTITUTION'S Equal Protection clause and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender. But, over the years, the courts have disagreed on whether these protections apply to a person who is born one gender and presents him- or herself as another. In 2005, the 10th circuit ruled in Etsitty v. Utah Transit Authority that a bus company could fire a male-to-female employee, because it would be a liability to have a person with male sex organs using the women’s restroom. However, in 2008, the D.C. district court ruled in favor of a transgender woman whose job offer at the Library of Congress was rescinded after she told her new employer she planned to transition from male to female. For the first time, a court held that discrimination based on a change in gender is no different from discrimination based on gender. But, since the Supreme Court hasn’t weighed in, the legal picture remains murky. “In most circuits, it is at best an open question,” says Shannon Minter, the legal director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights. “We are nowhere near any national uniformity.”
This spring, Nevada became the fourteenth state to pass a law prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity or expression, when Republican Governor Brian Sandoval signed measures protecting trans people in housing, employment, and public accommodations like restrooms. (The religious right has launched a major assault on what it calls “bathroom bills,” warning that they will turn restrooms into hunting grounds for pedophiles and rapists.) More than 130 cities and towns now have similar anti-discrimination laws. But transgender rights have hit snags elsewhere. The New York Senate failed to pass a gender identity antidiscrimination bill in June. In Texas, some transgender people could be prevented from marrying since a court recently ruled that marriage can only occur legally between people of opposite-gender birth certificates. In May, Tennessee’s governor signed a law stating that a person can only be protected from discrimination according to the gender listed on his or her birth certificate—a move seemingly designed to exclude transgender people, since Tennessee is one of three states that bans any changes to a birth certificate.
On the federal level, the most highprofile legislative effort has been the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or enda, which would safeguard both gay and transgender people in the workplace and was first introduced to Congress in 1994. When it comes to lobbying for such legislation, the transgender community lacks both numbers and clout. As a result, it has depended on the gay rights movement to advance its cause. The trans advocates I spoke with credit mainstream lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgbt) organizations for doing crucial work to advance their cause; however, the largest, most politically powerful group, Human Rights Campaign (HRC), has not always been unequivocally supportive.
In 2004, HRC passed a resolution stating that it would not support any gay rights legislation that omitted protections for gender identity. The next year, the organization invited Donna Rose to be the first transgender person on its board. However, on the board materials, Rose’s gender was marked as “other,” a classification that signaled a lack of understanding. During the next two years, many people Rose met through her work for HRC informed her that they still weren’t comfortable with trans issues. But, in September 2007, HRC’s president, Joe Solmonese, agreed to speak at Southern Comfort, the largest trans conference in the United States. It was, Rose thought, a “high-water mark in terms of the recognition of trans needs by what I would call the professional gay organizations.” Solmonese’s message was clear: “We absolutely do not support and in fact oppose any legislation that is not absolutely inclusive, and we have sent that message loud and clear to the Hill.”
When Democrats gained control of Congress in 2006, enda had its best chance of passing in years. But, before the vote, Representative Barney Frank removed gender identity from the bill, arguing the omission would give it a better chance of success. Hundreds of gay and lesbian rights organizations condemned the non-inclusive bill. But HRC initially stayed silent. For a time, Rose says, the group cut her out, refusing to answer her calls and e-mails. Then, according to Rose, at a meeting to decide HRC’s position, Solmonese argued that Frank’s incremental strategy was the fastest way to get an inclusive bill. After a divided vote, the board backed the gay-only enda. Afterward, Rose felt forced to resign. “There was never an intention of throwing transgender people under the bus,” says David Smith, a senior staff member at HRC. “The decision was made to get to the most expeditious route to get an inclusive bill.”
But there was no question that the enda debate had exposed a rift. Writing in Salon, John Aravosis, a gay man, accused trans people of threatening gay rights. “When we are asked—well, told—to put our civil rights on hold, possibly for the next two decades, until America catches up on its support for trans rights, a lot of gay people don’t feel sufficiently vested in trans rights, sufficiently vested in the T being affixed to the LGB, to agree to such a huge sacrifice for people they barely know.”
The gay-only enda bill passed the House, but died in the Senate. In subsequent attempts to revive the legislation, the gender identity provision has continued to be controversial. Mara Keisling, the executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, told me, “I talked to one member of Congress who voted for the hate crimes bill in 2009 and got beat up over it by his constituency. His staff person said to us, ‘[He is] looking for an excuse not to vote for enda, so we are going to use the recent addition of gender identity as an excuse. Nothing personal.’” Frank has reintroduced enda this session, with the transgender provisions restored, but has said that their inclusion has resulted in a “drop-off” in likely votes.
ON THE Saturday of Easter weekend, Caroline saw the video of Chrissy Lee Polis posted on Facebook. She was at home recovering from her facial surgery and was still swollen, half blind, and on heavy medication. But she e-mailed friends to try to set up a vigil for Monday night. She got permission from the local police, bought a p.a. system, and persuaded McDonald’s to close the restaurant that night. Hundreds of people showed up.
Since her transition, Caroline has become an outspoken activist. The rally we attended on the day I met her was for both a transgender bill and a gay marriage bill, but Caroline and another woman were the only trans people I saw, and the young advocate leading the group had to remind everyone to mention the transgender bill when talking to their legislators. In March, Caroline testified in front of the Maryland House for a bill that would provide greater protections for transgender people in housing and employment. (The bill passed that chamber but died in the Senate, whose president, Mike Miller, told reporters, “I have senators that are not going to hire, uh, people with male sexual organs who wear a dress to serve as receptionists, OK? Um—how can we say to constituents, you’ve got to do this?”) “Now that she can be who she really wanted to be, there’s no stopping her,” Diane told me.
Caroline keeps a photo of her and Diane in the visor above the driver’s seat of her car. She shows it to me nearly every time we meet. They don’t see each other often, but recently they had a meal together, and Diane admitted to Caroline that she was angry. “After I got that out, I wanted to lie on his shoulder. I didn’t want to lie on her shoulder, you know?” Diane said.
This is the hardest thing about Caroline’s transition for the people around her, even those who have been nothing but supportive: Caroline gets to be the person that she has always wanted to be, but that means the person she once was is gone. Dave also struggles with this change. Both he and Caroline told me that they miss their father-son relationship. Sometimes Dave gets frustrated that Caroline isn’t as healthy as she should be. “My dad really doesn’t exercise or care what she eats,” he says. And her personality is different, too. “The hormones make her really emotional, and it’s hard to be around a person who cries all the time.” For Caroline’s part, she feels a profound relief when it comes to Dave. He is engaged and has just finished his first year of med school. There, the students undergo a psychological evaluation, and she often tells me that Dave received one of the highest scores. For years, Caroline thought she was going to screw up her kids simply by being who she was, but Dave has proved her wrong.
While Caroline’s transition has, so far, turned out to be a lot less traumatic than she feared, no one should have to wait until they are 55 years old to begin living as her true self. For people to feel safe to do this, our society will need to build a series of legal and cultural protections for transgender people. And, at a broader level, it will need to reevaluate just how necessary it really is to define people according to what’s between their legs. This would clearly help the transgender community, but it might be healthy for the rest of us, too.
Meanwhile, as grim as the current reality is for transgender people in America, ultimately, in Caroline’s experience, I found cause for hope. The last group of people that Caroline came out to, after her friends and Diane and her son and her family, was her coworkers—the mostly male staff of a Virginia government office. By then, her hair was getting long, she had pierced her ears, and people were starting to talk. So she called a meeting and stood before about 80 employees. “You may have been hearing rumors ... that I am going to switch genders,” she told them. “I am confirming those rumors are true.” They gave her a standing ovation.
18 comments
Does "who one really is" seem to anyone at TNR like an intellectually serious category? Apparently so. Ask Wieseltier (or some other grownup at the magazine) about it. He will straighten you out.
- westendorf
June 28, 2011 at 9:45am
While legal and social constructs may "need" to be created for true civil rights for transgender individuals, the process of that happening is dead in the water for a very long time. While I agree with the author, it seems that his epiphany is really based on only one anecdotal experience with a transgender person, one who happens to have had a positive experience. I feel that this issue is FAR more complex than this. As the author concedes, 1 in 3 transgenders attempt suicide. Despite the well-intentioned urgency for change expressed in the article, I don't get the sense that society, the medical community, certainly not the public and legislature, or even the author or many transgenders themselves understand the issue with the clarity that we have regarding homosexuals. Too soon :(
- RJSampson1
June 28, 2011 at 10:43am
The primary psychological issue that produces gut-level reactions of this sort ("I have senators that are not going to hire, uh, people with male sexual organs who wear a dress to serve as receptionists, OK?") is the uncomfortable dissonance of seeing someone perceived bodily to be of one sex behaving in ways felt to be strongly characteristic of the other sex. This "transphobia" (reaction against perceived gender transgression) is almost certainly what lies behind much homophobia: the mental image of a woman behaving butch or a man behaving femme is what many express as their scare-image of gays. The gay movement has largely overcome this issue, and perhaps this is in large measure due to so many gays who are not publicly gender-trangressive making themselves known to family, friends, and colleagues. If there is a lesson to be drawn here, it may be that acceptance of elementary civil rights for transpeople won't be likely until the public consciousness apprehends more apparently gender-conforming than gender-transgressing transfolk, that is to say, more who could "pass" as being native in their lived-in gender, if they just chose not to reveal their history. But being out about one's history as being trans--for one who is gender-normative--requires a huge leap of faith that one's friends, employer, and co-workers won't hold that history against one; so there may be a long time before the public sees any significant number. In the mean time, a very few of us try to combat transphobia by being publicly gender-transgressive while yet maintaining acceptance by friends, family, and colleagues. It's an awkward balancing act that few find personally satisfying.
- harrissg@slu.edu-old
June 28, 2011 at 12:08pm
I concur in many way with harssg. I am out and can't afford surgeries or voice lessons right now. Perhaps more trans people who "pass" easily being out would help, but that doesn't change the situation for trans people who don't in some way and still need to be out to live a relatively health life. Nor does it help others who are ostracized by society for aspects of their superficial appearance.
- EmilyPN
June 28, 2011 at 12:39pm
In spite of the differences between the communities in some places, much of progress has been made through collaboration of LGBT groups in Maryland. In fact our Governor, Martin O’ Malley, has pledged his support and action to “foster a deeper understanding and respect for the dignity of all persons” and he expects that we will have progress in the next legislative sessions. The main group now leading the charge, Gender Rights Maryland, is actively building coalitions and partnerships with allies throughout the state and region. On a personal note I’d like to thank the author for her countless hours of research, for really trying to understand the unwarranted troubles that transgender people face, and for understanding that we are just like anyone else in our everyday lives. And thank you to my family, friends, co-workers, and others who contributed their time and honest thoughts to help with this article. I’d also like to thank my healthcare team who has been treating me with surgeries, medicines, and therapy, respectively: Dr. Sherman Leis, Dr. Michael Dempsey, and Martha Harris of Banyan Counseling. Lastly, I want to say publicly to my son, David - who in the past decade has become my closest friend - something I say all the time in person, “I could not be prouder of the person of upstanding character that you have become.”
- Caroline_T@live.com
June 28, 2011 at 12:58pm
I worked at a printing company in NJ and there was a transgendered woman who worked there in the bindery department. While there were a few minor issues (all lavatory related), she was generally accepted by everyone. There was also a pretty committed lesbian couble in the bindery as well. My company was not the least bit progressive, it was a printing company...the only more foul mouthed people I imagine are longshoremen. I guess one of the benefits of living in NJ and the NYC area is people just don't care as long as you don't lie or steal and do your job.
- blackton
June 28, 2011 at 1:09pm
As a child, I read quite a bit of science fiction. Much of what I read 40 or so years ago, is now coming true. For example, one of the writers I read was John Varley. In the Wikipedia article about him, it says in part: “Varley is noteworthy for the frequent prominence of female characters, unusual in science fiction, and especially so among male authors of hard science fiction. This prominence is visible not only in his Eight Worlds history where sex changes are routine, but in his other works as well. The idea of routine sex changes is also an example of the sexual themes that color his works without dominating them.” I thought I was avant-garde when my daughter just before graduating from college told us that she was engaged to her (female) college roomate, and my wife and I took it in stride. They now have a seven-year-old child I call my science-fiction grandchild who thinks it perfectly normal to have two mommies and two daddies (her sperm donor and his steady partner). I have never (knowingly) met a transgender person. I appreciate this article for updating me on the latest science-fiction come true “reality journalism.” We're not done yet. Artificial intelligence is marching along...how soon will there be androids that can pass an “in-person, up close, Turing test?” Humans are very attached o their dogs, cats, horses, (in our case chickens), and so on. How soon until we use genetic engineering to make talking animal companions with upgraded intelligence that can also pass a Turing test. Both of these forecasts imply huge acceptance, “civil rights” and ethical conflicts. The first comment, by westendorf said, “Does 'who one really is' seem to anyone at TNR like an intellectually serious category?” With all due respect, Mr. or Ms. westendorf, are you ready for the future? Like it or not, it's here, now. I, for one, am glad to see TRN taking it seriously.
- skahn
June 28, 2011 at 2:02pm
I can't imagine a respectable argument for de jure or de facto discrimination in hiring or civil rights based on a mismatch between one's sex and one's gender identity. Beyond any shadow of a doubt, the kind of abuse described in this article's opening is contemptible, and we should all insist it stop. But, "accept them for who they really are?" What does that mean? Isn't it inherent in their condition that who they really are is ambiguous? Does accepting Caroline for who she is mean acknowledging her as a person who fundamentally rejects her own physical condition to the point that she must medically and surgically alter it? Isn't Caroline herself rejecting "who she is" when she makes those choices, or have we progressed so far along the separation of mind and body to the point that it is irrelevant when one rejects the other?
- IowaBeauty
June 28, 2011 at 3:31pm
"Accept them for who they really are" means these various levels: 1) Treat socially in a civil manner, according ordinary respect and dignity in personal interaction; in particular, do not denigrate because of supposed inappropriateness of gender-specific behavioral traits. 2) Treat in gender-specific ways (particularly as regards personal name, pronoun reference, and honorific), as the person plainly indicates is desired. 3) Allow for gender-specific social interactions--such as what is considered socially acceptable dress and grooming--according to the person's plainly expressed gender preference. 4) Integrate into sex-specific legal interactions--such as public restroom usage, sex-identity on documentation, and sex-specific marriage laws--according to the person's plainly expressed desire to integrate into that sex-specific legal role. Probably any reasonably polite person can agree on the first two levels. Level 3 is probably dependent on the transperson presenting a gender-normative appearance. Level 4 is probably the most controversial: Should it depend upon some degree of bodily modification? If so, how much? Does it depend on whether MtF vs. FtM? Should there be any attempt to harmonize federal, state, and local law or administrative practice? (The legal issues are all over the place, with wildly contradicting laws, administrative regulations, and case law at all levels.) But does this get to the nub of "who they really are"? What does it *mean* to be a man or a woman? Does it mean a purely physical classification, that one is born into? (If so, then what about the in-between cases, the person who looks M in this respect but F in this other? Look at the genes? But there numerous in-betweens in that classification also.) Does it mean a purely physical classification, that one can surgically and hormonally alter? Does it mean a purely mental attribution, embodying full-scale self-identification either with men as a class or women as a class, that one has from the age one first can distinguish men from women? (If so, what about someone who has neither the on self-identification nor the other?) Does it mean a purely mental attribution, that might conceivably change and reverse over time? These are very tough questions, as they get at the center of how we socially interact. Our social interaction--our very language, in English, with sex-specific pronoun reference so ubiquitous and absolutely required--is founded upon a stable and readily identifiable labeling of everyone as plainly male or plainly female. Anyone who challenges the foundation of this unconscious basis to our social practice is upsetting on a fundamental level: We don't know how to deal with, even how to refer, to someone who is colored outside the lines, whether because of present appearance or because of a non-standard history. So much of what we say and do is built upon a simplifying assumption of "looks and acts like this, means has body like that, and always has had". It's not easy knowing what is expected of us when confronted with someone breaking those simplifying assumptions. It requires new ways of thinking about things we grew up believing were so simple.
- harrissg@slu.edu-old
June 28, 2011 at 5:28pm
Not too many years ago, it was almost impossible to see the discussion of gay and lesbian issues as having any serious intellectual basis. Any effort to discuss the lives or motivations or gays and lesbians came down to perversion, smut, and (where necessary) awkward silences when discussing the private life of a major artist or writer who was gay. It was, in other words, a tasteless joke. I have observed first hand the transition of someone from male to female in their public, outward gender. And at the end, it was perfectly obvious that she was always a "she", inside, where it mattered. The outward identity may have re-coalesced around a different set of external presentations, but the inner person was the same, and that person was very definitely female. And much happier being able to express herself outwardly as well. But I've also seen the sniggers and finger-pointing, dismissive comments (even from those who consider themselves more than usually enlightened and tolerant) and general unwillingness to take the life situation of a transgendered person seriously. It's just like it was with gays decades ago - you just couldn't pretend to take these things seriously. You had to be "in on the joke". There was no possibility to see a transgendered person (like a gay person in the past) as having the same inherent dignity and integrity that everyone else has. "Why must they look like that? Truck drivers in dresses!" -- not too long ago it was "Why must they act like that? All that mincing and lisping!" Can you remember when that sort of comment was thrown back in the face of gay people? I certainly can, by people who commanded all kinds of intellectual and social respectability. Can it change? Most certainly it can. Transgendered people are just as likely to be educated and middle-class (or not) as anyone else; just as likely to have aspirations and the wish (and ability) to contribute to society, or simply to live quietly in peace, in the same way that everyone else has. Congratulations to TNR for taking this step and recognising the rights and very existence of transgender people as a serious issue that serious people can (and should) talk about and respond to.
- jcovell
June 28, 2011 at 11:00pm
"Isn't it inherent in their condition that who they really are is ambiguous?" The transgendered people I know are perfectly clear on who they are -- it's just that society expects them to be something else because of the bits they were born with.
- frippo
June 29, 2011 at 12:15am
Congratulations and appreciation for the (mostly) excellent comments, especially harrisg. By coincidence, last night I was listening to an old This American Life episode from 2002 about testosterone. Particularly interesting was an interview with a lesbian who went through a sen change operation. After she embarked on the change, one of the first things done to her/him was to increase testosterone levels to about double the level. Not exact words (and I don't dare use italic), but he/she said something along the lines of <> Speaking as a man in my sixties (and past the fevers of youthful male sexuality) this brought make--not nostalgia, but interesting memories and perspectives. We are simply creatures of our blood chemistry, are we not?
- skahn
June 29, 2011 at 5:03pm
This article needs to see a wider audience than just TNR subscribers. If it's at all possible to move it out from behind the "subscription only" wall someone should do so.
- santoast
June 29, 2011 at 5:51pm
Agreed santoast. I had to link to it on Facebook with my TNR login and pass posted so more people could read it.
- SarabandeG
July 3, 2011 at 7:22pm
This article fails to ask the hard sociological questions, like what is the significance of tens of thousands in the U.S. suddenly discovering their alleged gender mis-assignment? Why the sudden explosion now? Is there possibly something more going on here beyond individual choice ? What's missing is for one, the under-the-radar body modification movement, so popular among younger people, where you have the 'right' to change your physical appearance by tattoos, piercing, etc. For many in this group, trans-sexual (sorry, I refuse to use the more PC term 'transgender') operation become just one more extension of what is essentially the same narcissism as the Botox-and-nip-and tuck-set. This is a market driven 'need,' an off-shoot of Lady Gaga turbo-capitalism, where for a price, you can continually change your identity. An extreme, but not atypical example, is the cult alternative musician, Genesis P. Orrige of Throbbing Gristle, who along with his girlfriend, decided to jointly alter their appearances so both would merge into one look. She died of a heart attack possibly triggered by the hormonal shots, while under the knife in one of the operations. You can Google his name to see what I'm taking about. Secondly, isn't the trans-sexual phenomenon at heart conservative? Instead of enlarging the range of human behavior, it narrows the options down to "girls act one way and boys another so if you act one way, you have to be trapped in the wrong gender's body." This explains its appeal to gay men and lesbians whose self-doubts and lack of acceptance lead them to the operating table to conform to traditional sex roles. Having said that, trans-sexual people should not have to suffer the extreme violence like the opening act in this article. But that's quite different from declaring it a new civil right. A more skeptical stance is called for beyond just accepting at face value what people say about themselves.
- cansv
July 26, 2011 at 7:39pm
You have had this photo for too long. Show more variety. To tell you the truth I do not care much about the struggles of the gays. There are more important items. I do not see a constant discussion about creating jobs. Now that is important. A third of the population is affected and there is non-urgency or serious discussion. Gays and non-gays are affected by unemployment.
- JAIMECHUCH
August 1, 2011 at 4:16am
It's August now--almost September. Could we change the picture?
- mlottman
August 21, 2011 at 10:05pm
I am glad this article pops up again in the year end reminiscences. As a child and young adult, I read a lot of science fiction, and then as I got older, I was startled and dismayed to see so much of it coming true. By our evolution, we (human beings) are the most flexible and plastic of "higher" animals. Our physical evolution and our social/cultural evolution (not sure of the best word for this phenomenon) was mostly accidental and unintended. As we skate into to the 21st century we are at the point where we can start to use ourselves (as individuals and as societies) as objects of art. Although when I was young I was a typical human male in my enthusiasm for lust (though certainly not in Newt's league), but even then I thought that evolution had left humans about 100 times more sexually driven and compelled than was necessary for our survival (after maybe the first 1000 years of human existence). So here we are, an "intelligent" creative, clever-cunning, artistic over-populated sexually-obsessed group of animals. "Playing with our sex organs" as an art form is just the first little move (like a hand slipping under a bra) down a path of incredible and unpredictable madness. XXX indeed.
- skahn
December 30, 2011 at 12:15am