WORLD OCTOBER 6, 2009
-
Read Later
READ LATERAvailable only to subscribers. SUBSCRIBE TODAY
-
Listen
ARTICLE AUDIO
- Font Size

Return to Afghanistan with a group of journalists, escorted by the French defense minister, Hervé Morin. A limited view: We only see valleys in Surobi and Kapisa. But an invaluable glimpse, nevertheless, because it counters what is heard almost everywhere.
First chapter, Tora, a small fort sitting on stones, some distance from Kabul. Welcome by Colonel Benoît Durieux, leader of the regiment and an intellectual, author of the excellent Rereading Clausewitz's On War. Movement toward Surobi, where an assembly of malik, the sages of the region, waits for us to join a ceremony opening a small school for boys. The number of armored vehicles mobilized for the trip, the extreme nervousness of the men, as well as the low-flying Caracal helicopter that brought us here early this morning, at times hovering only ten meters above the ground--all this leaves no doubt about the seriousness of the threat. But there is also no doubt about the fact that the military's strategy relies on a simple idea that has little to do with the caricature drawn by my country's media: to show that we are, of course, there to wage war, but also that the stakes of this war are the security, peace, and access to care and education of a population for whom the coalition is an ally.
Rocco, a base in the heart of the Uzbin Valley, ten kilometers upstream from the place where ten French Special Forces soldiers were killed in August 2008. It is another western encampment, even more isolated and surrounded by mountains. Camping there in tents reinforced with plywood, in preparation for winter, are 159 men. They had just barely set up camp, Captain Vacina tells me, when the elections arrived, as did the Taliban's bombardment of polling places, the response of the Afghan regular forces supported by these troops, and the incredible spectacle of people from the countryside coming to vote in the midst of bombs and machine gun fire. An occupation force, really? Neo-colonialism, like the useful idiots of Islamo-progressivism say? Armies, like people, have an unconscious, and I do not deny that temptation can exist. But what I see there, for the moment, is this: a military force that has come, literally, to allow people to vote.
Tagab, in the heart of Kapisa province, further north still, is where I come across Colonel Chanson, who, as a young Blue Beret in Sarajevo, remembers having denied me access to Mount Igman 15 years ago. The same mountainous landscape, though at the foot of these mountains there is a green valley infested with armed groups. The base of operation was bombarded yesterday. Two days earlier, a more intense attack provoked a sortie. And the colonel recounted the climb toward the opposite position, the occupation of the ridge, the skirmish with a jihadist combat unit on the way back, the very difficult combat, and, finally, the routing of the attackers. Nejrab, 18 kilometers to the north, also in the Kapisa valley. It is this fourth base that houses the Third Battalion of the Afghan national army, under the command of Colonel Khalili. I recall my recommendation in my 2002 Afghanistan report commissioned by then–French President Jacques Chirac: Aid the building of a national Afghan army and allow it, as soon as possible, to assume responsibility for isolating, and then defeating, the neo-fascist Taliban.
And now, that is exactly what is happening, if I believe Khalili's explanations. He's the one ultimately responsible for the sorties. He is the one who decides to request--or not--reinforcements from the French battalion. And also under his command are the notorious American "advisers." Once again, the opposite of the cliché. Once again, the inverse of the accepted image of a Franco-American war in which Afghans are only bit players. Bagram, finally. The U.S. base in Bagram. The terrible secret prison, impossible to approach, 200 meters from where I am. And the 42 men of the French Harfang detachment who are in charge of two drones, piloted on the ground by navigators trained on Mirage jets and furnishing the troops with all the information likely to reduce the risks of their operations. The "low-intensity" conflict whose result, as everyone well knows, is never only military. I didn't see everything, of course. But what I did see is this: An ugly war, like every war; but a just war, less poorly led than is said, and a war that can, with the right choices, be won.
Bernard-Henri Lévy is the author of Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism. Translated from French by Sara Phenix.
4 comments
Anything can be won if you define winning in such a way it fits the assumptions you make about what it means to win. It's like shooting an arrow into a barn and then painting the target [and the bullseye] around it. After all, we achieved "peace with honor" in Vietnam didn't we? And the surge helped us to win the war in Iraq. Even if we leave and it all falls apart again, they lost it this time, not us. Words can weave the reality of illusion or the illusion of reality for anyone simply be believing they are true. As George Will noted in his own recent assessment of Afghanistan: In Through the Looking Glass, Alice says she is unable to believe the White Queen's claim to be 101. The Queen responds, “Try again: draw a long breath, and shut your eyes.” Alice: “There's no use trying, one can't believe impossible things.” Queen: “Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” Regarding Afghanistan, the president might believe he can effect a Houdini-like escape, from the box his words have built. george: Now, Will of course is almost certainly unselfconscious about how this can be applied to the boxes he builds with words too. Irony is not his trump card. And isn't Levy building one above too? But wait, wait, some will protest, Levy's words are planted on the ground. He was over there, for Christ sakes!! Yes, but what did he see on the ground that the White Queen didn't want him to see? Are we expected to believe the White Queens aren't everywhere in Afghanistan; that, instead, there are folks concerned only with objectifying reality as it actually is? Trust me: If you really, really want to believe something....say, emotionally and psychologically....six is the least number of ways you can come up with to do it. Take the bit about "just war". Justice. Now THAT is a made up word, isn't it? There must be thousands of impossible things we have learned to believe about that. And that's merely in Iraq. george
- iambiguous
October 6, 2009 at 2:45am
L'enfer, c'est walton.
- liberal reformer
October 6, 2009 at 11:00am
Mr. Levy, anything you write is tainted by your abhorrent worldview as evidenced by your comments about Polanski. Kindly go jump off a bridge.
- edgecrusher018
October 7, 2009 at 3:27pm
This piece reminds me of a Hemingway parody I wrote when I was a junior in high school, except mine was better. Does anybody else need to be heard from before the President makes a decision about what we are doing in this godforsaken country (Afghanistan, I mean; there are so many)? Obama sounded like he knew what to do during the election, but now he seems preoccupied with searching for a "middle ground" on everything. That's not what we elected him for, and even John McCain knows that half measures don't work (and end up not pleasing anybody). I think Obama is losing his nerve, and I hope the Nobel Prize, which he kind of deserves in a way, doesn't lead to another long period of waffling while he re-imagines himself as Mahatma Gandhi instead of Abe Lincoln.
- mlottman
October 9, 2009 at 2:28pm